Coccinelle archive on
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Markus Elfring <>
To: Coccinelle <>
Subject: [Cocci] Working with pipes for parallel SmPL data processing?
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 19:19:07 +0200
Message-ID: <> (raw)


The Coccinelle software supports also a variant of parallel data processing
after the parameter “--jobs” was passed.

It is nice when it works to distribute analysis on source files to some processors.
Unfortunately, undesirable software behaviour can be observed if a database
like “PostgreSQL 11.3-7.1” would be used in such a system configuration.
Thus I imagine that it can be occasionally appropriate to perform desired
parallel data processing by the usage of a detailed pipeline instead.

How do you think about another application for this kind of
inter-process communication?

Cocci mailing list

             reply index

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-09 17:19 Markus Elfring [this message]
2019-06-10 21:00 ` Julia Lawall
2019-06-11  7:50   ` Markus Elfring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Coccinelle archive on

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror cocci/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 cocci cocci/ \
	public-inbox-index cocci

Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone public-inbox