Coccinelle archive on
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Markus Elfring <>
To: Coccinelle <>
Subject: [Cocci] Checking the parsing status for “linux/string.h”
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 13:13:18 +0200
Message-ID: <> (raw)


I have tried the following command out with the software combination
“Coccinelle 1.0.8-00004-g842075f7”.

elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Linux/next-patched> spatch --parse-c --include-headers-for-types --recursive-includes include/linux/string.h
nb good = 444,  nb passed = 41 =========> 7.17% passed
nb good = 444,  nb bad = 87 =========> 84.79% good or passed

Will it matter to improve the shown parsing result any further?

Cocci mailing list

                 reply index

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Coccinelle archive on

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror cocci/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 cocci cocci/ \
	public-inbox-index cocci

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone public-inbox