From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02717C56202 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0855922253 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:57:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="T/j74qzy" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0855922253 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [132.227.104.7]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0AKBvZfb008651; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:57:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [127.0.0.1]) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D967789; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:57:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D188F7B6 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:54:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-io1-xd30.google.com (mail-io1-xd30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20:0:0:0:d30]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0AKBsVhA017614 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:54:32 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io1-xd30.google.com with SMTP id r9so9597610ioo.7 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 03:54:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NBQOAYOM9U2wwOrK1ihvhs1ugJGYUlTe1HU6Sz1u0+c=; b=T/j74qzyTZ77/gaCQZO621EluFS5ggjbWf5urNp57XMhD5tD7d2G7xbMuVU/svCEOF f8HHE2FZji6KJlrPKk+gRB9db8F5EofKkb+sXmsDjFZ+IM5Kewvt9F/cTzIjaC8gQ6ql /g19zd/aRZV22nMZ5dY42p9OeSaUDAgcEuPpDIh4XeLZeg47fpJDqZrroT+Q0Lyu7plr fwjBRyTLAL2GHCH2QRLMBxqy7rZgKpL0SYmZ4rV1gbQssRa88QdoeJU3XHSgQWDZB15L G6Y7iIFFAtr1sVxREV8h1mezsiuFrdSEN545ukb1c73qcuIX7auyceBArXj0YBuShlGS mJfA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NBQOAYOM9U2wwOrK1ihvhs1ugJGYUlTe1HU6Sz1u0+c=; b=dp9D0qsR+V1F93Z1StDSPreAoxP7zBy5QDcL/dSyTmBMpu1L4SletXNj739lLH4qpC qx5a6eo9SuwLzIWWM7Du1+lFhTqguVuQ48egEY8JsUhAi6wKy0RALNfafmwaW3j+w2IT 5pllILBEXLA52z6gkBDJBb+PshSgb2hWf6o9mrHX+/fdzVFB60N7X6rbvRJLGhyIZups bz2I5NetmDd9BWm2UpnYPHESFcEf1PdnaA1zAqf8AhU+0QcRbkCB0s7yAcL1mLuEQV2n akdJ1uOy0waZK37U7m7YtCx/+2MkGpkhilFdcrZLoWCWrfVdUSednlXxiEwxY2smQp27 eQUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Oz3TDxAeyeqyU0Ax8s2p5wdwbt5NaxDogq/IVBI2CDSxu98Wm b6g7wU67X5qwShPr8rHNYPPYfWeRGOkExBoLEw0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxV4Cv4eYJOWb112LXcxmMu1+YXT3+h46C0waaOJ6v5tSncgYifjH0IKn7iyEjNPJ9DTnGfJMkf9XaV9zMqNxo= X-Received: by 2002:a02:c547:: with SMTP id g7mr18483628jaj.88.1605873271453; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 03:54:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Alexandru Ardelean Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:54:20 +0200 Message-ID: To: Julia Lawall X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, Sender e-mail whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:57:35 +0100 (CET) X-Greylist: Sender DNS name whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3302:283c:0:0:0:2]); Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:54:32 +0100 (CET) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:57:33 +0100 Cc: LKML , Robo Bot , Andy Shevchenko , Joe Perches , Alexandru Ardelean , cocci Subject: Re: [Cocci] Proposal for a new checkpatch check; matching _set_drvdata() & _get_drvdata() X-BeenThere: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Errors-To: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:47 PM Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > On Thu, 19 Nov 2020, Joe Perches wrote: > > > On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 17:16 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 4:09 PM Alexandru Ardelean > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > So, I stumbled on a new check that could be added to checkpatch. > > > > Since it's in Perl, I'm reluctant to try it. > > > > > > > > Seems many drivers got to a point where they now call (let's say) > > > > spi_set_drvdata(), but never access that information via > > > > spi_get_drvdata(). > > > > Reasons for this seem to be: > > > > 1. They got converted to device-managed functions and there is no > > > > longer a remove hook to require the _get_drvdata() access > > > > 2. They look like they were copied from a driver that had a > > > > _set_drvdata() and when the code got finalized, the _set_drvdata() was > > > > omitted > > > > > > > > There are a few false positives that I can notice at a quick look, > > > > like the data being set via some xxx_set_drvdata() and retrieved via a > > > > dev_get_drvdata(). > > > > > > I can say quite a few. And this makes a difference. > > > So, basically all drivers that are using PM callbacks would rather use > > > dev_get_drvdata() rather than bus specific. > > > > > > > I think checkpatch reporting these as well would be acceptable simply > > > > from a reviewability perspective. > > > > > > > > I did a shell script to quickly check these. See below. > > > > It's pretty badly written but it is enough for me to gather a list. > > > > And I wrote it in 5 minutes :P > > > > I initially noticed this in some IIO drivers, and then I suspected > > > > that this may be more widespread. > > > > > > It seems more suitable for coccinelle. > > > > To me as well. > > To me as well, since it seems to involve nonlocal information. > > I'm not sure to understand the original shell script. Is there > something interesting about pci_set_drvdata? Ah, it's a stupid script I wrote in 5 minutes, so I did not bother to make things smart. In the text-matching I did in shell, there are some entries that come from comments and docs. It's only about 3-4 entries, so I just did a visual/manual ignore. In essence: The script searches for all strings that contain _set_drvdata. The separators are whitespace. It creates a list of all xxxx_set_drvdata functions. For each xxxx_set_drvdata function: It checks all files that have a xxxx_set_drvdata entry, but no xxxx_get_drvdata I piped this output into a file and started manually checking the drivers. There is one [I forget which function] that is xxxx_set_drvdata() but equivalent is xxxx_drvdata() As Andy said, some precautions must be taken in places where xxxx_set_drvdata() is called but dev_get_drvdata() is used. Cases like PM suspend/resume calls. And there may be some cases outside this context. > > julia _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci