From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9426CC32792 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 12:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E403C20830 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 12:22:27 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E403C20830 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [132.227.104.7]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x93CMCZr009750; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 14:22:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [127.0.0.1]) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2ED077C3; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 14:22:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14E4F76E8 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 04:32:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.190]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8U2WQum027051 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 04:32:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 68D437E31D355E6E3DF1; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:32:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.133.213.239) by DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:32:19 +0800 To: Julia Lawall References: <20190928094245.45696-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> <2c109d6b-45ad-b3ca-1951-bde4dac91d2a@huawei.com> From: Yuehaibing Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:32:18 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [10.133.213.239] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, Sender e-mail whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Thu, 03 Oct 2019 14:22:12 +0200 (CEST) X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 04:32:27 +0200 (CEST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 14:22:09 +0200 Cc: michal.lkml@markovi.net, nicolas.palix@imag.fr, maennich@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr Subject: Re: [Cocci] [RFC PATCH] scripts: Fix coccicheck failed X-BeenThere: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Errors-To: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr On 2019/9/30 0:32, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > On Sun, 29 Sep 2019, Yuehaibing wrote: > >> On 2019/9/28 20:43, Julia Lawall wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Sat, 28 Sep 2019, YueHaibing wrote: >>> >>>> Run make coccicheck, I got this: >>>> >>>> spatch -D patch --no-show-diff --very-quiet --cocci-file >>>> ./scripts/coccinelle/misc/add_namespace.cocci --dir . >>>> -I ./arch/x86/include -I ./arch/x86/include/generated >>>> -I ./include -I ./arch/x86/include/uapi >>>> -I ./arch/x86/include/generated/uapi -I ./include/uapi >>>> -I ./include/generated/uapi --include ./include/linux/kconfig.h >>>> --jobs 192 --chunksize 1 >>>> >>>> virtual rule patch not supported >>>> coccicheck failed >>>> >>>> It seems add_namespace.cocci cannot be called in coccicheck. >>> >>> Could you explain the issue better? Does the current state cause make >>> coccicheck to fail? Or is it just silently not being called? >> >> Yes, it cause make coccicheck failed like this: >> >> ... >> ./drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c:290:2-8: preceding lock on line 243 >> ./fs/fuse/dev.c:1227:2-8: preceding lock on line 1206 >> ./fs/fuse/dev.c:1232:3-9: preceding lock on line 1206 >> coccicheck failed >> make[1]: *** [coccicheck] Error 255 >> make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 > > Could you set the verbose options to see what the problem is? Maybe the > problem would be solved by putting virtual report at the top of the rule. > But it might still fail because nothing can happen without a value for the > virtual metavariable ns. diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/add_namespace.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/add_namespace.cocci index c832bb6445a8..99e93a6c2e24 100644 --- a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/add_namespace.cocci +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/add_namespace.cocci @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ /// add a missing namespace tag to a module source file. /// +virtual report + @has_ns_import@ declarer name MODULE_IMPORT_NS; identifier virtual.ns; Adding virtual report make the coccicheck go ahead smoothly. > > Should the coccinelle directory be only for things that work with make > coccicheck, or for all Coccinelle scripts? > > julia > > . > _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci