From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D113C43381 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 08:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B245A222D0 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 08:34:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B245A222D0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lip6.fr Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [132.227.104.7]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/lip6) with ESMTP id x1G8YCTf026779 ; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 09:34:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [127.0.0.1]) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CED076FA; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 09:34:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28C4976F4 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 09:34:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/lip6) with ESMTP id x1G8Y9j5028357 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 09:34:09 +0100 (CET) X-pt: isis.lip6.fr X-Addr-Warning: ATTENTION - Votre correspondant a fourni une adresse d'enveloppe @lip6.fr, mais ce message ne provient pas de lip6.fr ! postmaster@lip6.fr. X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,376,1544482800"; d="scan'208";a="296376402" Received: from abo-58-107-68.mrs.modulonet.fr (HELO hadrien) ([85.68.107.58]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Feb 2019 09:34:09 +0100 Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 09:34:08 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Markus Elfring In-Reply-To: <10281c5d-8b32-0a02-17ae-20bf86f8dc65@web.de> Message-ID: References: <201902161504357846572@zte.com.cn> <10281c5d-8b32-0a02-17ae-20bf86f8dc65@web.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323329-1058747191-1550306049=:3212" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, Sender e-mail whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Sat, 16 Feb 2019 09:34:12 +0100 (CET) X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Sat, 16 Feb 2019 09:34:09 +0100 (CET) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 Cc: Yi Wang , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Michal Marek , Wen Yang , Nicolas Palix , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, Cheng Shengyu , Wen Yang Subject: Re: [Cocci] [v5] coccinelle: semantic code search for missingput_device() X-BeenThere: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Errors-To: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-1058747191-1550306049=:3212 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Sat, 16 Feb 2019, Markus Elfring wrote: > > Thanks, We will change it to something like this: > > In a function, for a local variable obtained by of_find_device_by_node() > > How do you think about another wording approach? > > 1. Precondition: > It will be checked where the return value is stored from > a call of the function “of_find_device_by_node”. > > 2. The source code search will be continued with … > > > > Thank you, but a local variable is necessary. > > Would you like to take additional storage possibilities for a safer > analysis approach into account? > > Is the restriction “local” really sufficient when such a pointer > could be copied to other variables? I've lost track of the original semantic patch, but perhaps it needs a when != e1 = e julia > > > >> Can it happen that on other function will perform the desired reference release? > > > > Thanks. > > Because the information of this local variable is not passed to the external function, > > this situation does not exist. > > Will copied pointers matter here? > > > > But it's over 80 characters. > > Long string literals can be accepted because of error message search concerns > around a tool like “grep”. > > > >> Will any more advanced error diagnostics be eventually developed? > > > > Hello, we are just doing the practical work in this field. > > Are you aware of additional software design options from computer science > and existing analysis tools? > > > > We also hope that it can support cross-function/cross-file/data stream analysis > > and other functions. > > This functionality will need further clarification. > > > > We are also analyzing the principle and code implementation of coccinelle, > > hoping to contribute a little. > > I am curious on how this situation will evolve further. > > Regards, > Markus > --8323329-1058747191-1550306049=:3212 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci --8323329-1058747191-1550306049=:3212--