From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> To: wen.yang99@zte.com.cn Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, michal.lkml@markovi.net, yellowriver2010@hotmail.com, nicolas.palix@imag.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Markus.Elfring@web.de, cheng.shengyu@zte.com.cn, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr Subject: Re: [Cocci] [v6] coccinelle: semantic code search for missing put_device() Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 08:04:31 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1902190804150.2570@hadrien> (raw) In-Reply-To: <201902191014156680299@zte.com.cn> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1438 bytes --] On Tue, 19 Feb 2019, wen.yang99@zte.com.cn wrote: > > > I would have a hard time saying which one is more reasonable to test, > > I suggest to reconsider the interpretation of this software situation once more. > > > since both are extremely unlikely. > > I disagree to this view because two ellipses were intentionally specified > > in published SmPL scripts. > > So some software developers found these “special use cases” important enough. > > >> In addition, we feel that we should probably accept this patch first, > > I disagree to this imagination because I would prefer to integrate a source code variant > > without a bug (which was copied from a version on 2013-05-08 by Petr Strnad). > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/coccinelle/free/pci_free_consistent.cocci?id=f7b167113753e95ae61383e234f8d10142782ace#n12 > > I hope that nicer run time behaviour can become also relevant here. > > Both cases are extremely unlikely. > Although we have tested these two methods in the existing kernel code, > considering the evolution of the kernel code, these special cases may occur, so we are willing to take them into account. > We plan to modify the code like this: > > id = of_find_device_by_node@p1(x) > -... when != e = id > +... when != e = (T)id > + when != id = (T)e This change is fine with me. julia > > Do you have any other questions? > Thanks. > > Regards, > Wen [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 136 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
next prev parent reply index Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-02-16 16:05 [Cocci] [PATCH v6] " Wen Yang 2019-02-16 16:33 ` Julia Lawall 2019-02-16 18:39 ` [Cocci] [v6] " Markus Elfring 2019-02-17 2:32 ` [Cocci] 答复: " Wen Yang 2019-02-17 7:42 ` Markus Elfring 2019-02-17 9:50 ` [Cocci] [PATCH v6] " Markus Elfring 2019-02-17 11:37 ` Julia Lawall 2019-02-17 11:42 ` Markus Elfring 2019-02-17 11:48 ` Julia Lawall 2019-02-17 12:00 ` [Cocci] [v6] " Markus Elfring 2019-02-17 12:05 ` Julia Lawall 2019-02-17 12:20 ` Markus Elfring 2019-02-17 12:52 ` Julia Lawall 2019-02-17 13:14 ` Markus Elfring 2019-02-18 3:22 ` wen.yang99 2019-02-18 6:43 ` Julia Lawall 2019-02-18 8:19 ` Markus Elfring 2019-02-19 2:14 ` wen.yang99 2019-02-19 7:04 ` Julia Lawall [this message] 2019-02-19 8:12 ` Markus Elfring 2019-02-19 8:29 ` Markus Elfring 2019-02-19 9:09 ` wen.yang99 2019-02-19 9:30 ` Markus Elfring 2019-03-06 11:18 ` Markus Elfring 2019-02-18 21:40 ` Markus Elfring
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1902190804150.2570@hadrien \ --to=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \ --cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \ --cc=cheng.shengyu@zte.com.cn \ --cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \ --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \ --cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \ --cc=wen.yang99@zte.com.cn \ --cc=yellowriver2010@hotmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Coccinelle Archive on lore.kernel.org Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/0 cocci/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 cocci cocci/ https://lore.kernel.org/cocci \ cocci@systeme.lip6.fr public-inbox-index cocci Example config snippet for mirrors Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/fr.lip6.systeme.cocci AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git