From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB3FC07542 for ; Sat, 25 May 2019 23:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 227652077C for ; Sat, 25 May 2019 23:53:47 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 227652077C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lip6.fr Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [132.227.104.7]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4PNrW5D027171; Sun, 26 May 2019 01:53:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [127.0.0.1]) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB797752; Sun, 26 May 2019 01:53:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C957774C for ; Sun, 26 May 2019 01:53:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4PNrVrm010669 for ; Sun, 26 May 2019 01:53:31 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,512,1549926000"; d="scan'208";a="307212800" Received: from unknown (HELO hadrien) ([207.96.196.254]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 May 2019 01:53:30 +0200 Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 01:53:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Markus Elfring In-Reply-To: <63bd01ee-ea4d-fcbe-dc07-98bc98347b1c@web.de> Message-ID: References: <81b409c6-5986-5961-5edf-843c6737d88c@web.de> <63bd01ee-ea4d-fcbe-dc07-98bc98347b1c@web.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323329-435899637-1558828410=:2816" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, Sender e-mail whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Sun, 26 May 2019 01:53:33 +0200 (CEST) X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Sun, 26 May 2019 01:53:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 Cc: Coccinelle Subject: Re: [Cocci] accessing comments X-BeenThere: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Errors-To: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-435899637-1558828410=:2816 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Sat, 25 May 2019, Markus Elfring wrote: > >> “… > >> let (c1b,c1m,c1a) = List.hd c1 in > >> …” > >> > >> > >> Can this programming approach result in undesirable data duplication? > > > > There is no data duplication. > > The involved data structures are unclear at the moment. > > > > Learn about pointers. > > How many different pointers will refer to empty strings here? > > > > >> * Which texts would you expect for your variables “…m”? > > > > There is an example: > > > > c4b: /* a comment1 */ > > c4m: /*in arglist*/ > > c4a: /* a comment2 */ > > How would you like to handle source code elements without > parameter lists? Parameter lists are irrelevant. That is just an example. As long as the SmPL token matches more than one token, it is possible that there is a comment between them. julia --8323329-435899637-1558828410=:2816 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci --8323329-435899637-1558828410=:2816--