From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CC9CA9EAF for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 16:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDE9320679 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 16:14:38 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EDE9320679 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lip6.fr Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [132.227.104.7]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x9RGENuX026710; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 17:14:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [127.0.0.1]) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F275F77B4; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 17:14:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5368677AE for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 17:14:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x9RGEJhJ020154 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 17:14:19 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,236,1569276000"; d="scan'208";a="324673688" Received: from ppp-seco11pareq2-46-193-149-47.wb.wifirst.net (HELO hadrien) ([46.193.149.47]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Oct 2019 17:14:18 +0100 Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 17:14:18 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: julia@hadrien To: Markus Elfring In-Reply-To: <258d568b-2783-9f13-d84d-37a84150432b@web.de> Message-ID: References: <258d568b-2783-9f13-d84d-37a84150432b@web.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323329-1074355972-1572192859=:2623" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, Sender e-mail whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Sun, 27 Oct 2019 17:14:23 +0100 (CET) X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Sun, 27 Oct 2019 17:14:19 +0100 (CET) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 Cc: Coccinelle Subject: Re: [Cocci] Searching designated initialisers with SmPL X-BeenThere: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Errors-To: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-1074355972-1572192859=:2623 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Sun, 27 Oct 2019, Markus Elfring wrote: > Hello, > > I hoped to achieve something together with the semantic patch language > by the following search pattern. > > @display@ > identifier action, driver; > @@ > static struct platform_driver driver = > { > <+... > *.remove = action > ...+> > }; > > > Unfortunately, I stumble on another error message. > > elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/janitor> spatch --parse-cocci show_designated_initialisers6.cocci > … > minus: parse error: > File "show_designated_initialisers6.cocci", line 7, column 1, charpos = 91 > around = '.', > whole content = *.remove = action > > > How would you like to clarify the software behaviour for > such an use case? I don't know why you would even expect this to work. .remove is not a mainingful construct in the C language. It is part of one, but it is not a construct by itself. julia --8323329-1074355972-1572192859=:2623 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci --8323329-1074355972-1572192859=:2623--