From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116FCC43331 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91836214E0 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:24:56 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 91836214E0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lip6.fr Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [132.227.104.7]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id xACDObVJ020349; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 14:24:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [127.0.0.1]) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C1877C3; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 14:24:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EABF577C2 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 14:24:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id xACDOa5e025429 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 14:24:36 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,296,1569276000"; d="scan'208";a="411392654" Received: from unknown (HELO hadrien) ([12.217.66.2]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Nov 2019 14:24:35 +0100 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:24:33 -0800 (PST) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: julia@hadrien To: Markus Elfring In-Reply-To: <12ee1bd3-9849-ce84-f03b-104b1c1cc86e@web.de> Message-ID: References: <12ee1bd3-9849-ce84-f03b-104b1c1cc86e@web.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323329-1670143960-1573565075=:2536" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, Sender e-mail whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 14:24:37 +0100 (CET) X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 14:24:36 +0100 (CET) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 Cc: Coccinelle Subject: Re: [Cocci] Using the same replacement for different source code X-BeenThere: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Errors-To: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-1670143960-1573565075=:2536 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 12 Nov 2019, Markus Elfring wrote: > Hello, > > The following change specification gets accepted by the Coccinelle software. > > @replacement@ > expression x, y; > @@ > ( > -x + y > +compute(x, y) > | > -x * y > +compute(x, y) > ) > > > I would appreciate if the specification of duplicate SmPL code It can't. You have asked this many times before. julia > can be avoided also for such an use case. > Thus I have tried further code variants out for the semantic patch language. > > @replacement@ > expression x, y; > @@ > ( > -x + y > | > -x * y > ) > +compute(x, y) > > > An error message is reported then. > > elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/Probe> spatch --parse-cocci replacement_for_two_cases2.cocci > … > 9: no available token to attach to > > > @replacement@ > expression x, y; > @@ > - \( x + y \| x * y \) > +compute(x, y) > > elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/Probe> spatch --parse-cocci replacement_for_two_cases3.cocci > … > 5: no available token to attach to > > > Can such a transformation approach ever work for similar source code? > > Regards, > Markus > _______________________________________________ > Cocci mailing list > Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr > https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci > --8323329-1670143960-1573565075=:2536 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci --8323329-1670143960-1573565075=:2536--