From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F9DC3524A for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 08:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 220D72087E for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 08:14:35 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 220D72087E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=inria.fr Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [132.227.104.7]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0148EOnE027885; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:14:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [127.0.0.1]) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7ED77EC; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:14:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BABCC77E8 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:14:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0148ENrL017142 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:14:23 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,398,1574118000"; d="scan'208";a="434317361" Received: from abo-208-123-68.mrs.modulonet.fr (HELO hadrien) ([85.68.123.208]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Feb 2020 09:14:23 +0100 Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:14:22 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Markus Elfring In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <72729ef6-f8df-942f-57aa-4b3fac75a20d@web.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323329-879344643-1580804063=:3236" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, Sender e-mail whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Tue, 04 Feb 2020 09:14:24 +0100 (CET) X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Tue, 04 Feb 2020 09:14:23 +0100 (CET) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 Cc: Wellington Wallace , Coccinelle Subject: Re: [Cocci] Replacing a std::string check by strcmp() with SmPL X-BeenThere: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Errors-To: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-879344643-1580804063=:3236 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Do you distinguish between the storage class specifier > >> and other uses of such a key word? > >> https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/auto > > > > Sorry. I know nothing about C++. > > I guess that you know something also for this programming language > according to the program option “--c++”. > https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/0cece3639048dc7e81c4b2cc8f2a6f7a57fd546b/docs/spatch.1.in#L434 > https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/issues/1 > > > > Auto seems to be supported > > I am looking for further evolution around this software area. > > > > - I see it in both the C parser and the SmPL parser. > > How would we like to handle corresponding development challenges? > > @display@ > expression X; > identifier I; > @@ > *auto I = X(...); > > > elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/Probe> spatch --parse-cocci show_variable_definition_with_auto1.cocci > init_defs_builtins: /usr/local/bin/../lib/coccinelle/standard.h > minus: parse error: > File "show_variable_definition_with_auto1.cocci", line 5, column 6, charpos = 47 > around = 'I', > whole content = *auto I = X(...); > > > Can such a source code search approach make sense also according to > the rules of the C programming language? I think it expects a type as well. I don't know if that is a reasonable assumption in C or in C++. julia --8323329-879344643-1580804063=:3236 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci --8323329-879344643-1580804063=:3236--