From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F7CC2D0B1 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 14:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2171C2087E for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 14:59:34 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2171C2087E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=inria.fr Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [132.227.104.7]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 014ExLuG004686; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 15:59:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [127.0.0.1]) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8699777EC; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 15:59:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5356F77E8 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 15:59:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 014ExJNp004305 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 15:59:19 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,402,1574118000"; d="scan'208";a="338035017" Received: from dt-lawall.paris.inria.fr ([128.93.67.65]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Feb 2020 15:59:19 +0100 Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 15:59:19 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: julia@hadrien To: eamanu In-Reply-To: <786d2ea9-621f-bcc4-b626-aed6454784e2@yaerobi.com> Message-ID: References: <786d2ea9-621f-bcc4-b626-aed6454784e2@yaerobi.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, Sender e-mail whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Tue, 04 Feb 2020 15:59:21 +0100 (CET) X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Tue, 04 Feb 2020 15:59:20 +0100 (CET) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 Cc: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr Subject: Re: [Cocci] coccinelle depends on unmaintained pygtk X-BeenThere: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Errors-To: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, eamanu wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Sorry if this issues is duplicated, I am new in the mailing list > and in a very quickly searching I didn't found about this issue. > > I am working on Coccinelle package on Debian Thanks! > and currently > exist the next bug [1]. > > There is any plan to port to use GObject Instrospection? > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885267 I think we should just drop the code that depends on it. It was added for a MS thesis more than 10 years ago, and I don't think anyone has used it since. I will look into it. julia _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci