From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH] coccinelle: iterators: Add for_each_child.cocci script
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:32:30 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2009241631310.2615@hadrien> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67ad40bd-c0c0-8c5c-54b2-c750cfeefd44@web.de>
On Thu, 24 Sep 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > +@ruletwo depends on patch && !context && !org && !report@
>
> How do you think about to combine code from two SmPL rules
> by using another SmPL disjunction like the following?
What is the goal of doing this?
It seems substantially harder to understand than three rules that each
take care of a specific case.
julia
>
> @addition_rule depends on patch && !context && !org && !report@
> local idexpression r.n;
> expression e,e1;
> expression list [r.n1] es;
> iterator r.i,i1,i2;
> statement S,S2;
> @@
> (
> i(es,n,...) {
> ...
> (of_node_put(n);
> |e = n
> |return n;
> |i1(...,n,...) S
> |
> +of_node_put(n);
> ?return ...;
> )
> ... when any
> }
> |
> i(es,n,...) {
> ...
> (of_node_put(n);
> |e = n
> |i1(...,n,...) S
> |
> +of_node_put(n);
> ?break;
> )
> ... when any
> }
> ... when != n
> when strict
> (n = e1;
> |
> ?i2(...,n,...) S2
> )
> )
>
>
> Regards,
> Markus
> _______________________________________________
> Cocci mailing list
> Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
> https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
>
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-24 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-24 14:10 [Cocci] [PATCH] coccinelle: iterators: Add for_each_child.cocci script Markus Elfring
2020-09-24 14:32 ` Julia Lawall [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-09-24 12:45 Markus Elfring
2020-09-24 10:35 Sumera Priyadarsini
2020-10-12 9:27 ` Julia Lawall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2009241631310.2615@hadrien \
--to=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr \
--cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).