From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93803C433DF for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 06:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D1112177B for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 06:19:20 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9D1112177B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=inria.fr Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [132.227.104.7]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09E6Ihpu015446; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 08:18:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [127.0.0.1]) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3F2778E; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 08:18:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF68174CE for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 08:18:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09E6IeYU012224 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 08:18:40 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,373,1596492000"; d="scan'208";a="361714265" Received: from abo-173-121-68.mrs.modulonet.fr (HELO hadrien) ([85.68.121.173]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Oct 2020 08:18:39 +0200 Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 08:18:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Markus Elfring In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323329-1997192021-1602656320=:2687" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, Sender e-mail whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 08:18:44 +0200 (CEST) X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 08:18:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 Cc: Michal Marek , Gilles Muller , Nicolas Palix , Coccinelle Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v2] coccinelle: iterators: Add for_each_child.cocci script X-BeenThere: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Errors-To: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-1997192021-1602656320=:2687 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Wed, 14 Oct 2020, Markus Elfring wrote: > > > Is short-circuit evaluation applied for a disjunction (according to macro calls) > > > in the discussed SmPL rule “r”? > > > > The short circuit evaluation is applied at the level of CFG nodes. > > For each CFG node, it tries the sequence of patters one by one until it finds > > one that matches. > > Do you acknowledge then that disjunctions of the semantic patch language > work in the way so far that subsequent condition parts are not checked any more > after a match was determined for a specific source code search pattern? Yes, at the CFG node level. > > Is this functionality equivalent to the operation “ordered choice”? > > Is another communication difficulty resolved now according to your hint > that macro calls would be disjoint (and distinct)? > > > Would you expect that the occurrences of the mentioned identifiers are different > in the analysed source files? Sure. julia --8323329-1997192021-1602656320=:2687 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci --8323329-1997192021-1602656320=:2687--