From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927F4C388F7 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 18:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2D6222260 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 18:57:11 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D2D6222260 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=inria.fr Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [132.227.104.7]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09PIuu2R027265; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 19:56:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [127.0.0.1]) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AFB75C18; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 19:56:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D5CC5C16 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 19:56:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09PIusZe006038 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 19:56:54 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,416,1596492000"; d="scan'208";a="474223595" Received: from 173.121.68.85.rev.sfr.net (HELO hadrien) ([85.68.121.173]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Oct 2020 19:56:54 +0100 Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 19:56:54 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Markus Elfring In-Reply-To: <8f58a94e-b093-a587-c56a-a0ea0fc1f3ea@web.de> Message-ID: References: <0d1575b0-ab37-663e-2464-278fd76280b5@web.de> <8f58a94e-b093-a587-c56a-a0ea0fc1f3ea@web.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, Sender e-mail whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Sun, 25 Oct 2020 19:56:56 +0100 (CET) X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Sun, 25 Oct 2020 19:56:54 +0100 (CET) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 Cc: Michal Marek , Gilles Muller , Nicolas Palix , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Coccinelle Subject: Re: [Cocci] =?utf-8?q?Coccinelle=3A_null=3A_Optimise_disjunctions_in_?= =?utf-8?b?U21QTCBzY3JpcHQg4oCcZW5vLmNvY2Np4oCd?= X-BeenThere: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Errors-To: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr On Sun, 25 Oct 2020, Markus Elfring wrote: > >> This analysis result indicates a clear ranking for such function calls. > >> Thus reorder the SmPL disjunction items according to their usage incidence. > > > > Did you actually test this before and after the change and see a > > difference in performance? > > Would you become interested to configure a representative test environment > for safe comparisons of corresponding run time characteristics > of the affected software? In what sense could the comparison possibly be unsafe? Just use time and run spatch on whatever machine you want. It's not that complicated. > > On my laptop, I see absolutely no difference, > > for the patch mode and for the context mode. > > Does such information trigger a desire to clarify involved aspects in more detail? Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6200U CPU @ 2.30GHz julia _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci