From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 428B0C433EF for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 10:12:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=date:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:message-id:references: mime-version:subject:reply-to:sender:list-id:list-help: list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:list-post:list-owner: list-archive; bh=xbSS6/wiDH/1RkoIqjpuk8UPCrRb3ic63i+lK3L+h/Y=; b=VVq5iXq/qtKmlbUVyK1ghyiP6A5qdqasJHNvswIa9zRq3G0D9TH8CYTs hujQcgqCvKGDFpAaV7vj9YiarshWvnocuc0DAEMXjn2MJfJ4wGnAOPpPz lh3DDUinXoJ/iFI4Nh+ry+mKvim+s1yMhFikZQ2L34ZFfDpiVys/vBK2J 8=; Received-SPF: SoftFail (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of cocci-owner@inria.fr is inclined to not designate 128.93.162.160 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=128.93.162.160; receiver=mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="cocci-owner@inria.fr"; x-sender="cocci-owner@inria.fr"; x-conformance=spf_only; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 ip4:192.134.164.0/24 mx ~all" Received-SPF: None (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@sympa.inria.fr) identity=helo; client-ip=128.93.162.160; receiver=mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="cocci-owner@inria.fr"; x-sender="postmaster@sympa.inria.fr"; x-conformance=spf_only Authentication-Results: mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=cocci-owner@inria.fr; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@sympa.inria.fr; dkim=hardfail (signature did not verify [final]) header.i=@inria.fr X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,297,1647298800"; d="scan'208";a="40717396" Received: from prod-listesu18.inria.fr (HELO sympa.inria.fr) ([128.93.162.160]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 13 Jun 2022 12:12:34 +0200 Received: by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix, from userid 20132) id 35BE1E02A4; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 12:12:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B618E0038 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 12:12:32 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=xbSS6/wiDH/1RkoIqjpuk8UPCrRb3ic63i+lK3L+h/Y=; b=ZQ457tF97m5mn6CMi7t5HVWoScnKbwtSSgkgmV4i8qd6jDKaF1OM4/iY XsvbYSJQZSbphS+NqBc22dkJxFafFZ1GaTTCdrWGPb1Chv8UWoz+Lij6E bh2lOb+K9jZxdTcO5vt/HCR+w31RcF/r7lAHbovMi5ntPymrWAwBqLIQr 8=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,297,1647298800"; d="scan'208";a="40717374" Received: from 245.122.68.85.rev.sfr.net (HELO hadrien) ([85.68.122.245]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jun 2022 12:12:32 +0200 Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 12:12:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Bagas Sanjaya cc: Dongliang Mu , Nicolas Palix , Jonathan Corbet , Dongliang Mu , cocci@inria.fr, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20220613071243.12961-1-dzm91@hust.edu.cn> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [cocci] [PATCH] dev-tools: fix one invalid url Reply-To: Julia Lawall X-Loop: cocci@inria.fr X-Sequence: 438 Errors-To: cocci-owner@inria.fr Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: cocci-request@inria.fr X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: On Mon, 13 Jun 2022, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 03:12:42PM +0800, Dongliang Mu wrote: > > From: Dongliang Mu > > > > Fix the invalid url about Semantic Patch Language > > > > I think what this patch doing is to point SPL reference URL from old > Coccinelle documentation (doc root) to actual SPL doc entry on new > Coccinelle page, right? If so, "fix invalid URL" may not be right patch > description and title. Agreed, thanks for the suggestion. julia