Re: [Cocci] Coccinelle question

[Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>]

> It seem to match. Running the following little patch/script
> 
> @@
> type T;
> identifier fn;
> @@
> 
> - T fn(
> + void fn(T *ret,
> 	...) {...}
> 
> generates, for example, the following diff
> 
> -int foo(void) {
> +void foo(int *ret, void) {
>    return 0;
>  }
> 
> Any idea what the best way to prevent this would be?

OK, sorry, I didn't notice that it was only ... in the matching part.  I 
think you could just put a dummy parameter:

@@
type T,T1;
identifier fn,i;
@@

- T fn(
+ void fn(T *ret,
	T1 i, ...) {...}

That should match cases with only one parameter, even though the , 
doesn't match anything.

julia


>> 
>>> Thank you in advance!
>>> 
>>>   Nicolas
>>> 
>>> P.S.: Is there a community where I can ask such questions without
>>> bothering people personally?
>> 
>> Yes, there is a mailing list.,  You should see this in the contact 
>> link at coccinelle.lip6.fr.  You should join the mailing list so I 
>> don't have to approve the posts.
> 
> Thank you, I've subscribed and added the list to this thread
> 
>   Nicolas
> 
>> 
>> julia
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci