From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>,
Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v2 04/10] mmap locking API: use coccinelle to convert mmap_sem rwsem call sites
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 08:22:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d780d91f-43fa-b2ec-1a08-80013b153a56@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200327021058.221911-5-walken@google.com>
> This change converts the existing mmap_sem rwsem calls to use the new
> mmap locking API instead.
>
> The change is generated using coccinelle with the following rules:
Would you like to apply only a single SmPL rule here?
> // spatch --sp-file mmap_lock_api.cocci --in-place --include-headers --dir .
Command parameters like “--jobs 8 --chunksize 1” can be also helpful
for a parallel execution of the desired software transformation.
I suggest to consider another possibility for a bit of fine-tuning in the shown
SmPL script if you would eventually care for nicer run time characteristics
for the application of such a SmPL disjunction.
How do you think about to order the elements according to a probable
function call frequency?
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
next parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-27 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200327021058.221911-1-walken@google.com>
[not found] ` <20200327021058.221911-5-walken@google.com>
2020-03-27 7:22 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2020-03-27 7:44 ` [Cocci] [PATCH v2 04/10] mmap locking API: use coccinelle to convert mmap_sem rwsem call sites Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-27 8:00 ` [Cocci] [v2 " Markus Elfring
2020-03-27 8:08 ` Michel Lespinasse
[not found] ` <20200327021058.221911-6-walken@google.com>
2020-03-27 8:21 ` [Cocci] [PATCH v2 05/10] mmap locking API: convert mmap_sem call sites missed by coccinelle Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d780d91f-43fa-b2ec-1a08-80013b153a56@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).