From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Cc: Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] Usage concerns around the SmPL construct “<+... … ...+>”
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 15:42:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d83ef383-fa56-6b0e-91af-4a8dfdab980c@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2002041524400.3345@hadrien>
> Coccinelle could provide an appropriate running time by just ignoring the
> <+... ...+>. But that seems like a pointless optimization, when the user
> could just not put the <+... ...+> in the first place.
I would like to express a specific SmPL functionality.
> Coccinelle already applies a rule everywhere that it occurs,
This aspect is clear to some degree.
> regardless of whether the two occurrences are in the same function.
Our views can be different also for the discussed use case.
* How much will the requirement for changing selected items
multiple times matter?
* Are we eventually looking for another clarification also
in the software documentation?
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-04 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-03 20:45 [Cocci] Replacing a std::string check by strcmp() with SmPL Markus Elfring
2020-02-03 20:52 ` Julia Lawall
2020-02-03 21:13 ` Markus Elfring
2020-02-03 21:28 ` Julia Lawall
2020-02-04 8:11 ` Markus Elfring
2020-02-04 8:14 ` Julia Lawall
2020-02-04 8:39 ` Markus Elfring
2020-02-04 10:38 ` [Cocci] Replacing usages of “auto” with SmPL? Markus Elfring
2020-02-04 11:01 ` Julia Lawall
2020-02-04 11:45 ` Markus Elfring
2020-02-04 12:07 ` Julia Lawall
2020-02-04 12:18 ` Markus Elfring
2020-02-03 21:31 ` [Cocci] Replacing a std::string check by strcmp() with SmPL Julia Lawall
2020-02-04 8:19 ` Markus Elfring
2020-02-04 12:24 ` [Cocci] Searching for usage of “auto” with SmPL? Markus Elfring
2020-02-04 12:42 ` Julia Lawall
2020-02-04 12:52 ` Markus Elfring
2020-02-03 21:00 ` [Cocci] Replacing a std::string check by strcmp() with SmPL wellington wallace
2020-02-04 13:02 ` Markus Elfring
2020-02-04 13:19 ` Julia Lawall
2020-02-04 13:28 ` Markus Elfring
2020-02-04 13:47 ` Julia Lawall
2020-02-04 14:08 ` Markus Elfring
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.21.2002041524400.3345@hadrien>
2020-02-04 14:42 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d83ef383-fa56-6b0e-91af-4a8dfdab980c@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).