Coccinelle archive on
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Markus Elfring <>
To: Enrico Weigelt <>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] NULL pointer constraints vs. compiler checks
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 17:27:22 +0200
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

> we recently have lots of patches for either adding missing NULL checks,

> removing unneeded ones, etc.

Would you like to point any more concrete change examples out?

> It seems that's an non-trivial terrain,

This area can be also challenging.

> so I'm thinking about potential compiler support.

Can any more development tools help?

> Does anybody know whether gcc has some way for not-null constraints ?

Will you get corresponding answers better from other information systems
than the mailing list here?

Cocci mailing list

      reply index

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-12 10:52 Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-07-12 15:27 ` Markus Elfring [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Coccinelle archive on

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror cocci/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 cocci cocci/ \
	public-inbox-index cocci

Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone public-inbox