Coccinelle archive on
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Markus Elfring <>
To: Julia Lawall <>, Coccinelle <>
Cc: Yi Wang <>,
	Michal Marek <>,
	Nicolas Palix <>,
	LKML <>,
	Ma Jiang <>,
	Cheng Shengyu <>,
	Wen Yang <>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] Coccinelle: Handling of SmPL disjunctions
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:52:53 +0200
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

>>> How do you think about to increase the matching granularity
>>> for this functionality?
>> No idea what this means.  Disjunctions are expanded up to the level of the
>> nodes in the control-flow graph.
> We have got different expectations for working with such nodes
> for possible (data flow) analysis.

Will the chances become better to clarify this functionality?

Which software components are involved so far?

Cocci mailing list

           reply index

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Coccinelle archive on

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror cocci/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 cocci cocci/ \
	public-inbox-index cocci

Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone public-inbox