From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB7CC2D0B1 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2955A20661 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="XYt/uJEg" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2955A20661 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [132.227.104.7]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 016BwVdL002661; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:58:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [127.0.0.1]) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F81877F9; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:58:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83B9777EE for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:58:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pj1-x1042.google.com (mail-pj1-x1042.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20:0:0:0:1042]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 016BwSAb009629 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:58:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pj1-x1042.google.com with SMTP id dw13so2393370pjb.4 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 03:58:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vZDWu0hisuBiJ1Oltuw8JrByh92q2F8SlvjmiuEPDJc=; b=XYt/uJEgRutP6xckcAck0RRpMfbNSa6CJ/+Y3aFAfrrt8bJxJeacm5Vc/WNTl0HLnT q8xI5/Wtp+QOjpQyeQ0psuRwQcX4VsCQ02mZv8gY4bu8qxEjw/X0gnLinsonbZ5HaJno 6p12noTNXTny+82o7Tx2e50kBnFWrFL6AUhCm9npJgW+XFUr1YDH1NF7PwmUQrqNn/xs ol1CWqrUlyPSlvxPt8e8WFy+2gtqmE0wInJu/ngdSTHugDPwsp/gfklXp5mv08Hb9dyq VBHHDkenqhFZZ41rV20hxl2Y3LXKKQpLhfF65WW60audPkbQRIixTtmUUGw4k8RisKuW 2GrQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vZDWu0hisuBiJ1Oltuw8JrByh92q2F8SlvjmiuEPDJc=; b=AfXpr1RHvwz9O+wHk/C1xwcRNNXoUhVFIyfctImAtsyv0kLn198c/4ONJOY7LychH4 LMzpcIOpGEI41E5CmH/zpM1Qcdsx8pIRBfvrZ4l/7nZVOg9lGXQx6vDMe84NgS2KDjT9 wthPKM7lrlco91rS8EtJu2vb0ESsWFOn2lU9MF0oYKjmXt8nVirJ/LYcEjTM60+zP2I2 YkFJhUVOiMTx1T02n2N71IK2lA1DO0q6HtycqF6s78G7gFYMka8uMMqt+WURQtCK6ok+ Ad3YZa+CTZ+LPsh24b0RJz8hX3qQMfa+37i/JSAzsV/Y2HKTPSeroL/wc2+KPtWHUgBm H4og== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV7L44iy9XVsjYCwOHd07umCajrkcE2NCWDBYHcsOnoQs314bzb 9/uH8ZLxc/lIVmOOINT4dhg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqygfJic+daovqKvub5/+UtE6+ltJrudkFwaQOKHEKliAa3dQ/IylpL7fk9PQcz2oCo7KMkHnQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e789:: with SMTP id cp9mr3290745plb.85.1580990308274; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 03:58:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2405:204:30e:4a31:b268:7a3:7dc6:f288]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b65sm3663359pgc.18.2020.02.06.03.58.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Feb 2020 03:58:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: From: Jaskaran Singh To: Markus Elfring Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 17:28:23 +0530 In-Reply-To: <132f414d-397f-fb9a-ff6e-5360df827147@web.de> References: <132f414d-397f-fb9a-ff6e-5360df827147@web.de> User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.5 (3.32.5-1.fc30) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, Sender e-mail whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Thu, 06 Feb 2020 12:58:32 +0100 (CET) X-Greylist: Sender DNS name whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3302:283c:0:0:0:2]); Thu, 06 Feb 2020 12:58:30 +0100 (CET) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 Cc: linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, "cocci@systeme.lip6.fr" Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH 2/2] tests: Add test case for matching pointers to const pointers (and variants) X-BeenThere: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Errors-To: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 19:55 +0100, Markus Elfring wrote: > Would you like to avoid any abbreviations in the patch subject? > I used abbreviations to keep the patch subject short but still clear. Would the following be a better subject? "tests: Add test case to match const pointer variants" Cheers, Jaskaran. > > > These types would not match previously. > > I imagine that this information can be improved for a nicer patch > description, > can't it? > > Regards, > Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci