From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.nearlyone.de (mail.nearlyone.de [46.163.114.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E16970 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 06:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 63F965E354; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 08:14:58 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monom.org; s=dkim; t=1628144098; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=AVBwOXSE1M+5hmBwp0MVfxlczCKfxu/j4K0S7salY9s=; b=SD/99bzfKKbZib7KfnKqaWgtNfdQALM3BLi2HnUDiwYOrVBpXNAdVHCmx5SrjmK3jK9tui H4yU0mI8IsLV+s6GKL43ol+CAuuilN/wzU3AUOQGQKdFXQY33y13EuJVtQ0tCOIwRpSa/O idGE+IuAwCjG7OLwuO7Ix1kxDMlEo6qhA19z23IhY/douj9JOT67ESYcItI4XFVAuXa6HA QAlqE1GW6UC0kTzCQNcESisqdaQt1YdDaIDWpKHMZbok+t3itfgvBGsAc5UZ2Z0615qBmN EGwR3Gdv4As7Y28w+1z/cFmw7ASgCyHM7A1Cis3CJfwt5Zy9kMAstIUNmPTbIA== Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 08:14:57 +0200 From: Daniel Wagner To: =?utf-8?B?THVrw6HFoQ==?= Karas Cc: connman@lists.linux.dev, Santtu Lakkala , Jussi Laakkonen Subject: Re: [PATCH] make possible to use alternative auth group with 2nd password Message-ID: <20210805061457.abhvax5ow55z4hwt@beryllium.lan> References: <1666033.JRX4bv1jlI@latitudemachine> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: connman@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1666033.JRX4bv1jlI@latitudemachine> X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Hi Lukas, On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 06:39:39PM +0200, Lukáš Karas wrote: > Some servers are configured with multiple authentication groups. > OpenConnect request just authentication entries that are valid > for specific group (process_auth_form method). So, authentication > group have to setup first, and new form have to be requested then. > > Some authentication groups may require secondary password. > For example one-time password from Google Authenticator app. >From my quick glance it looks reasonable. @Santtu, as you have done some serious work recently on the plugin, do have any objections? Daniel