From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.nearlyone.de (mail.nearlyone.de [46.163.114.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE6EA3FC2 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 06:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 8BAD15E30A; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:44:05 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monom.org; s=dkim; t=1630305845; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=p3qNNlXKMjafLpPxSGVrW+h44Kz7rEYsIm/UK774f8k=; b=MKDcu68JoNgTwBT6Arz70KcNtKmf/n06w24olki+vK7QJN1jE7iQWPxPaGr1E3cMCK1mlj NLf12xN/SeOoA0k0lIMlmu+i9KiHHEL/bbR7IFf6tW+v7lyW2W2mnvdXogz3gMNCpZSG4Z kQu1XXk5w1J5HZ1nZ3wLpDvfBLSX/5jhAhsFFsoGB04KuMPiZvpm5j0Bey6EJq+kSdBFmo psxlr7b8sG8rTOknuilYANk/h+6Kzz9Jq0uB5UgW/bZsn4iZycGCrPap/ob8tTkS6JgtAT tkCzA3DWgBX+qW3AOhOD17bbulR8al9o+7Rc6TSbwy2LMPP5pQAbAntq0r23nQ== Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:44:03 +0200 From: Daniel Wagner To: =?utf-8?B?0KHRgtGA0LDRhdC40ZrQsCDQoNCw0LTQuNGb?= Cc: connman Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] service: Do not trigger wispr start when EnableOnlineCheck is disabled Message-ID: <20210830064403.5r3szonne7baipa2@carbon.lan> References: <20210829195321.23396-1-wagi@monom.org> <20210829195321.23396-3-wagi@monom.org> <20210829200849.6ttu3udd65fk7lt3@prancingpony> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: connman@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20210829200849.6ttu3udd65fk7lt3@prancingpony> X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 10:08:49PM +0200, Страхиња Радић wrote: > On 21/08/29 09:53, Daniel Wagner wrote: > > Do not try to use wispr when the user has disabled the online check. > > The patch you proposed seems fine to me. The gist is to let the user control if > the online check happens or not. Could you give them a quick test if they work for you? Thanks!