From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.nearlyone.de (mail.nearlyone.de [46.163.114.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D1B13FC2 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:13:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 626895E30A; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 10:13:26 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monom.org; s=dkim; t=1630311206; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to:references; bh=eeY9vN2XHlkJglmeXfBueVb5dMH7FaMs0NnbxcaP1Io=; b=XIFZQ2zFGV8l/O1p3ENZLoloRz8CwJD1r10DN/qrbHKneJqZgH/BXYw8Vl1ynERo4OgrL7 duWxneEbK3EMpGe6n+cdWM/p/sLc6CYBj5+ZXv8E8h7v99erT9bH+Iu2HEpdJTuzRHiczS bghEMfzwtNl+uFV4JD1zZszAPriM11QSlix3vPGp4obwFlHUBzSrIELZ4OKMkXre4Tf1fJ nwJFre9Y3awwm5N3Lc38yPWL4R0AMEhAhVL1S6B8h/hnTvQAbSC2jw1f5Kj+JbbuABaGfr COcWDkg+m7tvEWeTvodvVrwxy2NLyDYlfz9mkm+3TCavWWTxvNIKT2142g6aPw== Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 10:13:25 +0200 From: Daniel Wagner To: "VAUTRIN Emmanuel (Canal Plus Prestataire)" Cc: "connman@lists.linux.dev" Subject: Re: [PATCH] service: Fix default service update on ready state Message-ID: <20210830081325.bt3qwlvsmjilhind@carbon.lan> References: <20210624080757.722whwmmwrnzffvb@beryllium.lan> <20210702072703.ye5a33wi7jk6qbyf@beryllium.lan> <20210702074102.7rmohctvgqzzn6fb@beryllium.lan> <20210829190711.3fcho47whyclr2id@beryllium.lan> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: connman@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Hi Emmanuel, On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 07:31:12AM +0000, VAUTRIN Emmanuel (Canal Plus Prestataire) wrote: > > Right, after being absent for a while (sorry) and rereading my argument > > in my last email I checked the code base again more closely. And I see > > where my thinko is. We have to sort against the old default for the > > preferred settings. Because we don't know yet the order according the > > user's preference. After we have done that we update the default route. > > Very tricky stuff. > > > Thanks for your patience. > > Daniel > > Great news Daniel, that we could finally converge, thank you for your time. No problem. I know I am bottleneck with upstream work. Sorry about that. Now I just hope we didn't introduce new regressions :) Thanks, Daniel