From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.nearlyone.de (mail.nearlyone.de [46.163.114.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90A3E29CA for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 08:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 639EB5CFD1; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:21:44 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monom.org; s=dkim; t=1643012505; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to:references; bh=QW/gtJ1s4Y/yabwZPdCxKwrcFoUNMa2yFi0yFY7xs0I=; b=HjvI6l5XwsMzLJLXT0po4MDtV9RjGdG1fkz8AtePqO+KrXDY11iX5RspSIv8EoYQuulyr5 vy7vZmDDM6lWlCQXwGud0Jc1B6C2SvOsZAv4DZzt+h/ZNkkUKcHrF1Spu85VuDXpzyJBgC HCu5g6iLEywPj8TbGA/PgYIrWBocE2QcawqhFzxabOlt20g9ixWjvoIu2yM6KY0prLl7ot QQ21B8Avz0yNglrYPGtlsEnkkRux2OWk+LPFKA2qWWZzjcOKCGs+/sN5FMONSU51kaFDX4 BL+bE8asN4XgonmmB1g7w5OZOeFrzP6xrqu6xlWS+hw5eLzFBww65Sa58YhAKA== Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:21:42 +0100 From: Daniel Wagner To: "VAUTRIN Emmanuel (Canal Plus Prestataire)" Cc: "connman@lists.linux.dev" Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwd: Always disconnect connection completely Message-ID: <20220124082142.slbsbfuhnisll4bn@carbon.lan> References: <20220119133927.1245607-1-Emmanuel.VAUTRIN@cpexterne.org> <20220121074740.axzlpaj55xtzeg5s@beryllium.lan> <20220123131808.x7vvxmkhbu3jieiz@beryllium.lan> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: connman@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 05:40:45PM +0000, VAUTRIN Emmanuel (Canal Plus Prestataire) wrote: > For your information, it seems that some other code does > not compile with this option (xt_match_parse, xt_target_parse in > unit/test-iptables.c & reset_xtables with no void argument in src/iptables.c). I don't have any fallouts in there. This could be just because I use a different compiler with different settings. Please report those failures. It's not good to paper over them in the long run. > > BTW, please check your formatting > What do you mean by that? Do you have some link with associated > guidelines to follow? There was the curly bracket on the same line as the function name. It should be covered in doc/conding-style.txt Daniel