All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: fdmanana@kernel.org
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] btrfs: more performance improvements for dbench workloads
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:34:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1611742865.git.fdmanana@suse.com> (raw)

From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

The following patchset brings one more batch of performance improvements
with dbench workloads, or anything that mixes file creation, file writes,
renames, unlinks, etc with fsync like dbench does. This patchset is mostly
based on avoiding logging directory inodes multiple times when not necessary,
falling back to transaction commits less frequently and often waiting less
time for transaction commits to complete. Performance results are listed in
the change log of the last patch, but in short, I've experienced a reduction
of maximum latency up to about -40% and throuhput gains up to about +6%.

Filipe Manana (7):
  btrfs: remove unnecessary directory inode item update when deleting dir entry
  btrfs: stop setting nbytes when filling inode item for logging
  btrfs: avoid logging new ancestor inodes when logging new inode
  btrfs: skip logging directories already logged when logging all parents
  btrfs: skip logging inodes already logged when logging new entries
  btrfs: remove unnecessary check_parent_dirs_for_sync()
  btrfs: make concurrent fsyncs wait less when waiting for a transaction commit

 fs/btrfs/file.c        |   1 +
 fs/btrfs/transaction.c |  39 +++++++--
 fs/btrfs/transaction.h |   2 +
 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c    | 195 ++++++++++++-----------------------------
 4 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 145 deletions(-)

-- 
2.28.0


             reply	other threads:[~2021-01-27 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-27 10:34 fdmanana [this message]
2021-01-27 10:34 ` [PATCH 1/7] btrfs: remove unnecessary directory inode item update when deleting dir entry fdmanana
2021-01-27 10:34 ` [PATCH 2/7] btrfs: stop setting nbytes when filling inode item for logging fdmanana
2021-01-27 10:34 ` [PATCH 3/7] btrfs: avoid logging new ancestor inodes when logging new inode fdmanana
2021-01-27 10:34 ` [PATCH 4/7] btrfs: skip logging directories already logged when logging all parents fdmanana
2021-01-27 10:34 ` [PATCH 5/7] btrfs: skip logging inodes already logged when logging new entries fdmanana
2021-01-27 10:34 ` [PATCH 6/7] btrfs: remove unnecessary check_parent_dirs_for_sync() fdmanana
2021-01-27 15:23   ` Josef Bacik
2021-01-27 15:36     ` Filipe Manana
2021-01-27 15:42       ` Josef Bacik
2021-01-27 10:35 ` [PATCH 7/7] btrfs: make concurrent fsyncs wait less when waiting for a transaction commit fdmanana
2021-01-27 15:26   ` Josef Bacik
2021-01-27 15:42 ` [PATCH 0/7] btrfs: more performance improvements for dbench workloads Josef Bacik
2021-02-01 21:56 ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1611742865.git.fdmanana@suse.com \
    --to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.