Re: suggested website faq addendum

[Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>]

On 3/7/24 17:38, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Hi -
> 
>> Please feel free to provide a diff to the sources so we can look at
>> your suggested changes.
> 
> Here it is.  I'm afraid I'm unable to provide answers to the questions.

Thanks!

Public readonly repos are also up now:
https://git.coretoolchain.dev/
 
> --- index.rst.txt.orig	2024-03-07 16:17:06.726132460 -0500
> +++ index.rst.txt	2024-03-07 16:20:31.854901376 -0500
> @@ -16,6 +16,13 @@
>      must meet more stringent expectations to maintain the trust of the 
>      ecosystem. It is with this context in mind that CTI has been formed.
>  
> +    For example, the following demands and expectations are based on the
> +    following origins:
> +    
> +    ?                   ?
> +    ?                   ?
> +
> +
>  * Q: What concrete steps will CTI help with?
>  
>      * A: Some of the major goals include:
> @@ -48,6 +55,13 @@
>        infrastructure. Projects of similar scope and importance have been
>        deploying significant resources for the use of the development community.
>  
> +* Q: Are there plans to construct a feasibility-confirming prototype of
> +  the entire constellation of enumerated services for a CTI project
> +  before its migration is decided?
> +
> +  * A: ?
> +
> +
>  * Q: Sourceware volunteers have fielded requests and organized volunteer 
>    efforts that have worked well. Does LF allow volunteers to administer 
>    the servers together with them? Have they in the past?
> 

-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.