From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Safford, David (GE Global Research)" <david.safford@ge.com>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Extend TPM PPI interface to support revision 1.3
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 17:06:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d34dd6ec-248e-b7f8-edb0-367f1f4f9356@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190208220025.GB13567@linux.intel.com>
On 2/8/19 5:00 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 04:21:02PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> I still think that in 5/5 branching could be better but is not a biggie
> for me (does not make the implementation as whole any kind of mess) and
> since it is now peer tested I rather would not modify it right now.
>
> Applied to master and next!
5/5 may cause a complaint about the scanf'ing of a single value in an
existing line. Let's see...
Thanks.
Stefan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-08 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-09 22:10 [PATCH 0/5] Extend TPM PPI interface to support revision 1.3 Stefan Berger
2019-01-09 22:10 ` [PATCH 1/5] tpm: ppi: pass function revision ID to tpm_eval_dsm() Stefan Berger
2019-01-16 21:45 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-09 22:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] tpm: ppi: rename TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID to TPM_PPI_REVISION_1 Stefan Berger
2019-01-16 21:46 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-09 22:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] tpm: ppi: Display up to 101 operations as define for version 1.3 Stefan Berger
2019-01-16 21:46 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-09 22:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] tpm: ppi: Possibly show command parameter if TPM PPI 1.3 is used Stefan Berger
2019-01-16 21:48 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-16 21:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-09 22:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] tpm: ppi: Enable submission of optional command parameter for PPI 1.3 Stefan Berger
2019-01-16 21:54 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-11 20:28 ` [PATCH 0/5] Extend TPM PPI interface to support revision 1.3 Safford, David (GE Global Research)
2019-01-14 19:51 ` Stefan Berger
2019-01-18 15:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-02-08 21:21 ` Stefan Berger
2019-02-08 22:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-02-08 22:06 ` Stefan Berger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d34dd6ec-248e-b7f8-edb0-367f1f4f9356@linux.ibm.com \
--to=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david.safford@ge.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.