All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@bugseng.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>, "Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>,
	"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	"Julien Grall" <julien@xen.org>,
	"Volodymyr Babchuk" <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>,
	"Bertrand Marquis" <bertrand.marquis@arm.com>,
	"Michal Orzel" <michal.orzel@amd.com>,
	"Roberto Bagnara" <roberto.bagnara@bugseng.com>,
	"consulting @ bugseng . com" <consulting@bugseng.com>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpuid: Change cpuid() from a macro to a static inline
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 15:10:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4fb75c8-b856-41c7-9c69-828d4505b231@bugseng.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39debf73-14bf-40a6-8aff-adf086595581@suse.com>

On 16/01/24 14:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 16.01.2024 12:58, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> Fixes MISRA XXX
> 
> Rule 5.5 if I'm not mistaken; had to look it up for the patch sent
> earlier in the day. As to "fixes" - when it's not an actual bug, I had
> (successfully) asked the bugseng guys to avoid that term, and instead
> use "addresses" or "eliminates a ... violation" or some such.
> 
>> No functional change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> 
> Jan

I confirm that it is Rule 5.5.

I would like to point out that although the patch fixes violations of
Rule 5.5, it introduces new violations of Rule 5.3 "An identifier 
declared in an inner scope shall not hide an identifier declared in an 
outer scope": cpuid is used also as an identifier for some formal 
arguments (the pipeline does not fail because Rule 5.3 is not tagged
as "clean" and the introduction of new violations does not cause
a failure).
A solution could be to rename the function adding a prefix or a suffix
to its name.

-- 
Federico Serafini, M.Sc.

Software Engineer, BUGSENG (http://bugseng.com)


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-16 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-16 11:58 [PATCH] x86/cpuid: Change cpuid() from a macro to a static inline Andrew Cooper
2024-01-16 13:02 ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-16 13:46   ` Andrew Cooper
2024-01-16 14:10   ` Federico Serafini [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d4fb75c8-b856-41c7-9c69-828d4505b231@bugseng.com \
    --to=federico.serafini@bugseng.com \
    --cc=Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=bertrand.marquis@arm.com \
    --cc=consulting@bugseng.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=michal.orzel@amd.com \
    --cc=roberto.bagnara@bugseng.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.