From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS/BTRFS/NFSD: provide more unique inode number for btrfs export
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 21:34:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8d67284-8d53-ed97-f387-81b27d17fdde@inwind.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <162906443866.1695.6446438554332029261@noble.neil.brown.name>
On 8/15/21 11:53 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2021, kreijack@inwind.it wrote:
>> On 8/15/21 9:35 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
>>> On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 09:39:08 +0200
>>> Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am sure that it was discussed already but I was unable to find any track
>>>> of this discussion. But if the problem is the collision between the inode
>>>> number of different subvolume in the nfd export, is it simpler if the export
>>>> is truncated to the subvolume boundary ? It would be more coherent with the
>>>> current behavior of vfs+nfsd.
>>>
>>> See this bugreport thread which started it all:
>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg111172.html
>>>
>>> In there the reporting user replied that it is strongly not feasible for them
>>> to export each individual snapshot.
>>
>> Thanks for pointing that.
>>
>> However looking at the 'exports' man page, it seems that NFS has already an
>> option to cover these cases: 'crossmnt'.
>>
>> If NFSd detects a "child" filesystem (i.e. a filesystem mounted inside an already
>> exported one) and the "parent" filesystem is marked as 'crossmnt', the client mount
>> the parent AND the child filesystem with two separate mounts, so there is not problem of inode collision.
>
> As you acknowledged, you haven't read the whole back-story. Maybe you
> should.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20210613115313.BC59.409509F4@e16-tech.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/162848123483.25823.15844774651164477866.stgit@noble.brown/
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/162742539595.32498.13687924366155737575.stgit@noble.brown/
>
> The flow of conversation does sometimes jump between threads.
>
> I'm very happy to respond you questions after you've absorbed all that.
Hi Neil,
I read the other threads. And I still have the opinion that the nfsd crossmnt behavior should be a good solution for the btrfs subvolumes.
>
> NeilBrown
>
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-17 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-27 22:37 [PATCH/RFC 00/11] expose btrfs subvols in mount table correctly NeilBrown
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 07/11] exportfs: Allow filehandle lookup to cross internal mount points NeilBrown
2021-07-28 10:13 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-07-29 0:28 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-29 5:27 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-06 7:52 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-08-06 8:08 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-06 8:18 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-07-28 19:17 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-07-28 22:25 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 04/11] VFS: export lookup_mnt() NeilBrown
2021-07-30 0:31 ` Al Viro
2021-07-30 5:33 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 01/11] VFS: show correct dev num in mountinfo NeilBrown
2021-07-30 0:25 ` Al Viro
2021-07-30 5:28 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-30 5:54 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-07-30 6:13 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-30 7:18 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-07-30 7:33 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-30 7:59 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-08-02 4:18 ` A Third perspective on BTRFS nfsd subvol dev/inode number issues NeilBrown
2021-08-02 5:25 ` Al Viro
2021-08-02 5:40 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-02 7:54 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-02 13:53 ` Josef Bacik
2021-08-03 22:29 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-08-02 14:47 ` Frank Filz
2021-08-02 21:24 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-02 7:15 ` Martin Steigerwald
2021-08-02 21:40 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-02 12:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-08-02 20:32 ` Patrick Goetz
2021-08-02 20:41 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-08-02 21:10 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-02 21:50 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-08-02 21:59 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-02 22:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-08-02 22:36 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-03 0:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 03/11] VFS: pass lookup_flags into follow_down() NeilBrown
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 11/11] btrfs: use automount to bind-mount all subvol roots NeilBrown
2021-07-28 8:37 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-28 8:37 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-28 8:37 ` [RFC PATCH] btrfs: btrfs_mountpoint_expiry_timeout can be static kernel test robot
2021-07-28 8:37 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-28 13:12 ` [PATCH 11/11] btrfs: use automount to bind-mount all subvol roots Christian Brauner
2021-07-29 0:43 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-29 14:38 ` Christian Brauner
2021-07-31 6:25 ` [btrfs] 5874902268: xfstests.btrfs.202.fail kernel test robot
2021-07-31 6:25 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 06/11] nfsd: include a vfsmount in struct svc_fh NeilBrown
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 10/11] btrfs: introduce mapping function from location to inum NeilBrown
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 02/11] VFS: allow d_automount to create in-place bind-mount NeilBrown
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 09/11] nfsd: Allow filehandle lookup to cross internal mount points NeilBrown
2021-07-28 19:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-07-28 22:29 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-30 0:42 ` Al Viro
2021-07-30 5:43 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 08/11] nfsd: change get_parent_attributes() to nfsd_get_mounted_on() NeilBrown
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 05/11] VFS: new function: mount_is_internal() NeilBrown
2021-07-28 2:16 ` Al Viro
2021-07-28 3:32 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-30 0:34 ` Al Viro
2021-07-28 2:19 ` [PATCH/RFC 00/11] expose btrfs subvols in mount table correctly Al Viro
2021-07-28 4:58 ` Wang Yugui
2021-07-28 6:04 ` Wang Yugui
2021-07-28 7:01 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-28 12:26 ` Neal Gompa
2021-07-28 19:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-07-29 1:29 ` Zygo Blaxell
2021-07-29 1:43 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-29 23:20 ` Zygo Blaxell
2021-07-28 22:50 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-29 2:37 ` Zygo Blaxell
2021-07-29 3:36 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-29 23:20 ` Zygo Blaxell
2021-07-30 2:36 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-30 5:25 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-30 5:31 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-30 5:53 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-07-30 6:00 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-30 6:09 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-30 5:58 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-30 6:23 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-30 6:53 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-30 7:09 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-30 18:15 ` Zygo Blaxell
2021-07-30 15:17 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-07-30 15:48 ` Josef Bacik
2021-07-30 16:25 ` Forza
2021-07-30 17:43 ` Zygo Blaxell
2021-07-30 5:28 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-07-28 13:43 ` g.btrfs
2021-07-29 1:39 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-29 9:28 ` Graham Cobb
2021-07-28 7:06 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-28 9:36 ` Wang Yugui
2021-07-28 19:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-07-28 21:30 ` Josef Bacik
2021-07-30 0:13 ` Al Viro
2021-07-30 6:08 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-13 1:45 ` [PATCH] VFS/BTRFS/NFSD: provide more unique inode number for btrfs export NeilBrown
2021-08-13 14:55 ` Josef Bacik
2021-08-15 7:39 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2021-08-15 19:35 ` Roman Mamedov
2021-08-15 21:03 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2021-08-15 21:53 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-17 19:34 ` Goffredo Baroncelli [this message]
2021-08-17 21:39 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-18 17:24 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2021-08-15 22:17 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-19 8:01 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-20 3:21 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-20 6:23 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-23 4:05 ` [PATCH v2] BTRFS/NFSD: " NeilBrown
2021-08-23 8:17 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-23 8:17 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-18 14:54 ` [PATCH] VFS/BTRFS/NFSD: " Wang Yugui
2021-08-18 21:46 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-19 2:19 ` Zygo Blaxell
2021-08-20 2:54 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-22 19:29 ` Zygo Blaxell
2021-08-23 5:51 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-23 23:22 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-25 2:06 ` Zygo Blaxell
2021-08-23 0:57 ` Wang Yugui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d8d67284-8d53-ed97-f387-81b27d17fdde@inwind.it \
--to=kreijack@inwind.it \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=rm@romanrm.net \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.