damon.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	sj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
	roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeelb@google.com,
	muchun.song@linux.dev, naoya.horiguchi@nec.com,
	linmiaohe@huawei.com, david@redhat.com, osalvador@suse.de,
	mike.kravetz@oracle.com, willy@infradead.org,
	damon@lists.linux.dev, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Change the return value for page isolation functions
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 20:26:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230215202648.92523-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1676424378.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>

Hi Baolin,

On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 18:39:33 +0800 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:

> Now the page isolation functions did not return a boolean to indicate
> success or not, instead it will return a negative error when failed
> to isolate a page. So below code used in most places seem a boolean
> success/failure thing, which can confuse people whether the isolation
> is successful.
> 
> if (folio_isolate_lru(folio))
>         continue;
> 
> Moreover the page isolation functions only return 0 or -EBUSY, and
> most users did not care about the negative error except for few users,
> thus we can convert all page isolation functions to return a boolean
> value, which can remove the confusion to make code more clear.
> 
> No functional changes intended in this patch series.

For the series,

Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>


Thanks,
SJ

[...]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-15 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-15 10:39 [PATCH v3 0/4] Change the return value for page isolation functions Baolin Wang
2023-02-15 10:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mm: change to return bool for folio_isolate_lru() Baolin Wang
2023-02-15 15:35   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-02-15 10:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mm: change to return bool for isolate_lru_page() Baolin Wang
2023-02-15 15:39   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-02-15 10:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm: hugetlb: change to return bool for isolate_hugetlb() Baolin Wang
2023-02-15 15:41   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-02-15 19:22   ` Mike Kravetz
2023-02-15 20:25   ` SeongJae Park
2023-02-16  2:04     ` Baolin Wang
2023-02-15 10:39 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] mm: change to return bool for isolate_movable_page() Baolin Wang
2023-02-15 15:44   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-02-16  2:07     ` Baolin Wang
2023-02-16 22:46     ` Andrew Morton
2023-02-15 20:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Change the return value for page isolation functions Linus Torvalds
2023-02-15 20:26 ` SeongJae Park [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230215202648.92523-1-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).