From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane?= Aulery Subject: Bug#501566: [MAN] Clarify two redirection mechanisms Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 19:50:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20141208185005.GA11773@free.fr> Reply-To: =?UTF-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane?= Aulery , 501566@bugs.debian.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline List-URL: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: To: 501566@bugs.debian.org, dash@vger.kernel.org, stephane.chazelas@gmail.com List-Id: dash@vger.kernel.org Hello, St=C3=A9phane Chazelas said: > Herbert Xu said: >> >> "Resource" is rather unwieldy, how about simply "file"? > > "file" could be misleading > > [...] > > IMO, "resource" is vague enough so as not to give the wrong idea > and I like that wording because it conveys the intended > mechanism clearly ("redirect to same thing as"). But I agree > it's not ideal. It is true that "resource" is dissonant as "file" is too restrictive. The term "file descriptor" is used above. Why not use it again? Regards, --=20 St=C3=A9phane Aulery --=20 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian= .org