From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D118C6FD18 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 14:25:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1680099954; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=kAcSoENm2NuQDs0oUzoYDUp1XVS0vD5Xiq4RUvJnSxM=; b=XuED2QfEeCjqWvCvnCzyVphDEqoLCpp/FQZ/YFgoKMeIVotK0KTmbrvaRYupXENS71nLSZ vHs7ASIKbvU3s6KVtLJSTbUY7Bxfv4z1q2k9oW3gMKuRZh+1XxdAhrIVhZdYtlY6xfV6Qt tXDZgPl/XK8T7BNTS8FwUepp9R++Bwg= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-127-g5e-uX-lNT6fWckRLHk7jA-1; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:25:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: g5e-uX-lNT6fWckRLHk7jA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E1B3857F81; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 14:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (unknown [10.30.29.100]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F3F4020C82; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 14:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1451719465B8; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 14:25:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) by mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159881946587 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 14:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id DC0C214171BB; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 14:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast03.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.19]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4656140EBF4 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 14:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B48EE85530E for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 14:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-271-ZjXNwThHNXWf68BXTk_4yg-1; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:08:37 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ZjXNwThHNXWf68BXTk_4yg-1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10664"; a="324789530" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,301,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="324789530" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Mar 2023 07:08:13 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10664"; a="795245926" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,301,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="795245926" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO b613635ddfff) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Mar 2023 07:07:54 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b613635ddfff with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1phWSv-000Jba-1B; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 14:07:53 +0000 Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 22:07:29 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Anuj Gupta , Jens Axboe , Alasdair Kergon , Mike Snitzer , dm-devel@redhat.com, Keith Busch , Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , James Smart , Chaitanya Kulkarni , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner Message-ID: <202303292151.7DDOUCIt-lkp@intel.com> References: <20230327084103.21601-5-anuj20.g@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20230327084103.21601-5-anuj20.g@samsung.com> X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.7 Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v8 4/9] fs, block: copy_file_range for def_blk_ops for direct block device. X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, joshi.k@samsung.com, Nitesh Shetty , gost.dev@samsung.com, anuj20.g@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, ming.lei@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, nitheshshetty@gmail.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Sender: "dm-devel" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.2 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: intel.com Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Anuj, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on axboe-block/for-next] [also build test ERROR on device-mapper-dm/for-next linus/master v6.3-rc4 next-20230329] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anuj-Gupta/block-Add-copy-offload-support-infrastructure/20230329-162018 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230327084103.21601-5-anuj20.g%40samsung.com patch subject: [PATCH v8 4/9] fs, block: copy_file_range for def_blk_ops for direct block device. config: loongarch-randconfig-r001-20230329 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230329/202303292151.7DDOUCIt-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/61819d260936954ddd6688548f074e7063dcf39e git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Anuj-Gupta/block-Add-copy-offload-support-infrastructure/20230329-162018 git checkout 61819d260936954ddd6688548f074e7063dcf39e # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=loongarch olddefconfig COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=loongarch SHELL=/bin/bash If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303292151.7DDOUCIt-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): loongarch64-linux-ld: fs/read_write.o: in function `.L633': >> read_write.c:(.text+0x42e0): undefined reference to `I_BDEV' -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel