From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jacob Keller Subject: Re: [trivial PATCH] treewide: Convert switch/case fallthrough; to break; Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 12:40:13 -0700 Message-ID: <321069c8-a4c1-56ff-49fb-4c2bce1e6352@intel.com> References: <20200909205558.GA3384631@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdl.wdc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20200909205558.GA3384631@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdl.wdc.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: Keith Busch , Joe Perches Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, oss-drivers@netronome.com, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, alsa-devel , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, dccp@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel. List-Id: dm-devel.ids On 9/9/2020 1:55 PM, Keith Busch wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 01:06:39PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: >> diff --git a/crypto/tcrypt.c b/crypto/tcrypt.c >> index eea0f453cfb6..8aac5bc60f4c 100644 >> --- a/crypto/tcrypt.c >> +++ b/crypto/tcrypt.c >> @@ -2464,7 +2464,7 @@ static int do_test(const char *alg, u32 type, u32 mask, int m, u32 num_mb) >> test_hash_speed("streebog512", sec, >> generic_hash_speed_template); >> if (mode > 300 && mode < 400) break; >> - fallthrough; >> + break; >> case 399: >> break; > > Just imho, this change makes the preceding 'if' look even more > pointless. Maybe the fallthrough was a deliberate choice? Not that my > opinion matters here as I don't know this module, but it looked a bit > odd to me. > Yea this does look very odd..