dm-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v4 3/5] dm: add support for passing through inline crypto support
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 22:58:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YCW2nWmHCunU1DwV@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YCQ/WjAsVA2gdb7d@gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:17:30PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 05:10:17AM +0000, Satya Tangirala wrote:
> > Update the device-mapper core to support exposing the inline crypto
> > support of the underlying device(s) through the device-mapper device.
> > 
> > This works by creating a "passthrough keyslot manager" for the dm
> > device, which declares support for encryption settings which all
> > underlying devices support.  When a supported setting is used, the bio
> > cloning code handles cloning the crypto context to the bios for all the
> > underlying devices.  When an unsupported setting is used, the blk-crypto
> > fallback is used as usual.
> > 
> > Crypto support on each underlying device is ignored unless the
> > corresponding dm target opts into exposing it.  This is needed because
> > for inline crypto to semantically operate on the original bio, the data
> > must not be transformed by the dm target.  Thus, targets like dm-linear
> > can expose crypto support of the underlying device, but targets like
> > dm-crypt can't.  (dm-crypt could use inline crypto itself, though.)
> > 
> > A DM device's table can only be changed if the "new" inline encryption
> > capabilities are a (*not* necessarily strict) superset of the "old" inline
> > encryption capabilities.  Attempts to make changes to the table that result
> > in some inline encryption capability becoming no longer supported will be
> > rejected.
> > 
> > For the sake of clarity, key eviction from underlying devices will be
> > handled in a future patch.
> > 
> > Co-developed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
> 
> I don't see any obvious issues with this latest version.  I assume you've tested
> it on real hardware?
> 
> If it's needed despite my Co-developed-by, feel free to add:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> 
> A few nits about comments, in case you resend:
> 
Thanks! I addressed the nits, added acked/reviewed-bys and resent v5.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-11 23:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-01  5:10 [dm-devel] [PATCH v4 0/5] add support for inline encryption to device mapper Satya Tangirala
2021-02-01  5:10 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH v4 1/5] block: keyslot-manager: Introduce passthrough keyslot manager Satya Tangirala
2021-02-01  5:10 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH v4 2/5] block: keyslot-manager: Introduce functions for device mapper support Satya Tangirala
2021-02-10 19:55   ` Eric Biggers
2021-02-01  5:10 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH v4 3/5] dm: add support for passing through inline crypto support Satya Tangirala
2021-02-10 20:17   ` Eric Biggers
2021-02-11 22:58     ` Satya Tangirala [this message]
2021-02-01  5:10 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH v4 4/5] dm: support key eviction from keyslot managers of underlying devices Satya Tangirala
2021-02-10 20:19   ` Eric Biggers
2021-02-01  5:10 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH v4 5/5] dm: set DM_TARGET_PASSES_CRYPTO feature for some targets Satya Tangirala
2021-02-10 20:24   ` Eric Biggers
2021-02-10 19:33 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH v4 0/5] add support for inline encryption to device mapper Mike Snitzer
2021-02-10 19:59   ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-11 23:01     ` Satya Tangirala
2021-02-11 23:04       ` Mike Snitzer
2021-02-12  0:47         ` Satya Tangirala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YCW2nWmHCunU1DwV@google.com \
    --to=satyat@google.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).