archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Wilck <>
To: "" <>,
	"" <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 3/5] multipath: print warning if multipathd is not running.
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:23:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Do, 2021-07-29 at 16:46 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> If multipath notices that multipath devices exist or were created,
> and
> multipathd is not running, it now prints a warning message, so users
> are
> notified of the issue.
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <>

I'm not sure about this. Are there zero valid use cases for using
multipath without multipathd? On production systems, I agree,
multipathd should always be running. Personally wouldn't want to see
this warning every time I run "multipath" while multipathd is
(temporarily) disabled. Have you got user requests for this feature?

In particular, I dislike the idea of putting this code into
libmultipath. I would love to get rid of the "is_daemon" logic some
day. If at all, the detection of the situation and the warning should
be implemented in multipath, IMO.

The message should be prefixed with the word "Warning: " to make sure
the admin understands that he's supposed to take action.


dm-devel mailing list

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-12 10:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-29 21:46 [dm-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Mulitpath: miscellaneous patches Benjamin Marzinski
2021-07-29 21:46 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 1/5] multipath.conf: fix typo in ghost_delay description Benjamin Marzinski
2021-08-12 10:22   ` Martin Wilck
2021-07-29 21:46 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/5] mpathpersist: fail commands when no usable paths exist Benjamin Marzinski
2021-08-12 10:23   ` Martin Wilck
2021-07-29 21:46 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 3/5] multipath: print warning if multipathd is not running Benjamin Marzinski
2021-08-12 10:23   ` Martin Wilck [this message]
2021-08-30 21:28     ` Benjamin Marzinski
2021-07-29 21:46 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 4/5] libmultipath: remove unneeded code in coalesce_paths Benjamin Marzinski
2021-08-12 10:23   ` Martin Wilck
2021-07-29 21:46 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 5/5] libmultipath: deal with dynamic PTHREAD_STACK_MIN Benjamin Marzinski
2021-08-12 10:23   ` Martin Wilck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).