From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0D7C6FA82 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:49:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234582AbiIZItH (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 04:49:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60968 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234620AbiIZIsn (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 04:48:43 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80E3B3C171 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 01:48:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id j24so6618152lja.4 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 01:48:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=dyoN5NkBMjN5fTrHiRf8M9wo3Eh26rWGMliaShD1tmk=; b=BD+lLtFdD0rf5g+823kwux0X8eeYS3fu/0vbz9T/6UhpzaHbVqcuWAAeGRcWPCFAky iT0j8JWeWZABFtsd3vpFyzHCA+XDmAsL0HkwzzxNof2S7+lkwqrfEFfuWePomLnPcksc 5eZVDgOnAl9qKB5/0A0bbJoBVFd6VUoipR7VCPjsrKFKzv9DxqyEbzcTw3PNjpjEFwHP XPJg0kg/7sIjPkUvzpzXVvdOhcf+D4yXlVl+olUtZE03G1qFEMYpny7w979Mr/oXBawP iP3MNLidJccY1p9435TeCXnR0Ggnfr+kicDYq3AjtOoXVkyPWoRl4RM5NxNe5LABysCj G2gQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=dyoN5NkBMjN5fTrHiRf8M9wo3Eh26rWGMliaShD1tmk=; b=et/5EmA02TAiR4rrSHGJyWKGut2u8KmWjucSguS9ngLEFutp43be8TqmWzRhmL36vp JI2oVqTk/HC1IAEIn7A/fgakoK6wg8uO95ufISlIrDIHIINqMNpGXzdOutQiLpL5HLda YG7Q8uFhGiK4HGdRpKQoVz2lHP4C0kfwxy49If0f7GTt6z27+1B6R3BKE9mN/NcaSudL vMS5tz8920520kHcNt1Xb6ewwplPq4p8dgShOYnsbz3xq5hznP1C7JIRaEVbuisVAO9f 2Xyv678eJilHaB251QxGj1/NdbgWjf7cbE85KNTvGqM87dQ1EeIaEKYkzWoUjhyGQIAI w4ZA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3q2TGgsESVohi/WdsKzl027fRrMQb5fEcT6JA1nXmtBtFiFpIh IZ+fZek+iNFMdX7HkKwfbpFuXQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4ml1rrIAAdDcF7x3+nZ6DRH+//vOF2T83Xh1IrnMXz3AhCGH85sn5jz2z/b+RKjUe9Gnigbw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:90d0:0:b0:26a:cd11:cb0e with SMTP id o16-20020a2e90d0000000b0026acd11cb0emr7103228ljg.444.1664182119550; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 01:48:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.21] (78-11-189-27.static.ip.netia.com.pl. [78.11.189.27]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b24-20020ac24118000000b00497a879e552sm2449550lfi.291.2022.09.26.01.48.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 01:48:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1841f368-e9db-1662-e950-c162a6b17f75@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:48:37 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: dma: Make minor fixes to qcom,bam-dma binding doc Content-Language: en-US To: Bhupesh Sharma , devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, bhupesh.linux@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, agross@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@somainline.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org References: <20220918081119.295364-1-bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org On 25/09/2022 21:55, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > > On 9/18/22 2:19 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 18/09/2022 09:11, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: >>> As a user recently noted, the qcom,bam-dma binding document >>> describes the BAM DMA node incorrectly. >> >> It's a bit confusing - what is exactly incorrectly described by binding? >> You did not make any changes to the binding itself... > > Sorry for the late reply. Your comment just skipped through my mail > filters :( > > I understand your point. I should have made the commit message more > descriptive (infact now I look at it, I see some key words are actually > missing from the commit message). > > The commit message should infact read as: > > "As a user recently noted, the qcom,bam-dma binding document > describes the BAM DMA node *in the example section* incorrectly. Fix the OK, now it makes sense :) Best regards, Krzysztof