From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5C6C2D0D2 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 03:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4774020733 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 03:57:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1577073445; bh=HMWmu7fLzjD4zHWaJI1X0iL80kRp1P9VNuoGUhoQRKM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=sJWi47Uupfxc8+s4CP9njs95kEP4JAhr86WyjPliZJmH5PpSxO2WDpIxMqjX0CDIN UEhKAD0+93IgZ4WjftD/sdGkEwS4iZSRL76s9iFEG9xLdrT85E7MjbKsIOAiXyfZM+ Mdx6C5bU/63hP5n3Ri+QcQJDYcSg3Hc0DSq09PT4= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726557AbfLWD5Y (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Dec 2019 22:57:24 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45694 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726539AbfLWD5Y (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Dec 2019 22:57:24 -0500 Received: from dragon (98.142.130.235.16clouds.com [98.142.130.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47A3E20709; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 03:57:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1577073444; bh=HMWmu7fLzjD4zHWaJI1X0iL80kRp1P9VNuoGUhoQRKM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=xJzoeeF1/dw1fgzu36QaQ97BE8OM0U2I1GejPfCl/ybUsDko7hz9wVs/TpOoKeqXB zI8e03xUgf/NVbcZFVre+m7tAV5sDvB0/uxkYHkrxvky6uU+e5I9AztgISvrqW7AIh 8krSe87z2BpOaWjH4TJVpWzP0qJ2pXGN0A1GxenQ= Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 11:57:01 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Peng Ma Cc: "vkoul@kernel.org" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , Leo Li , "dan.j.williams@intel.com" , Robin Gong , "dmaengine@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [v5 2/3] arm64: dts: ls1028a: Update edma compatible to fit eDMA driver Message-ID: <20191223035701.GK11523@dragon> References: <20191212033714.4090-1-peng.ma@nxp.com> <20191212033714.4090-2-peng.ma@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191212033714.4090-2-peng.ma@nxp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: dmaengine-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 03:38:15AM +0000, Peng Ma wrote: > The eDMA of LS1028A soc has a little bit different from others, So we > should distinguish them in driver by compatible. > > Signed-off-by: Peng Ma Applied, thanks.