From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83235C3524A for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 06:21:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D90021741 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 06:21:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1580797284; bh=waTbpnj8XzyIheuqB898WOEZRqq9Gg076SBnBNB35DM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=lKF+bJMPuZe6op/Gda8jVYdRGGbCfJM3J02Z1ZS5PdluOP8a6ZbrAAIz6rQ5i+9Pz ayCgvizpgTcOu1yebIERwhHEuDlfI6nybqOW7ra6XNLDNQu418O20cQnmiR79RezL0 ZKxP+Jd921h/XBF8lihD+lt+Dp29riH5scodo9DE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726053AbgBDGVY (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2020 01:21:24 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47478 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725834AbgBDGVX (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2020 01:21:23 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [106.200.229.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 849AD2086A; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 06:21:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1580797283; bh=waTbpnj8XzyIheuqB898WOEZRqq9Gg076SBnBNB35DM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=t0PtyeHIyyOSvIvyTz54NHh1iQjnHNCua/MXv9obJNYWx/rlOVV2kZnjWMs8Y2DwZ vR23SNKWMH45gsIyCGTQGiIb9drCrJPDORq8ghGflHr+f+5I2MaCNj7mHnNewN+QSB +xXccJzg8pkCsS1bT2Ou9uZd28bXLLHG1UVxnhII= Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 11:51:18 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Peter Ujfalusi , dmaengine , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Dan Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] dmaengine: Stear users towards dma_request_slave_chan() Message-ID: <20200204062118.GS2841@vkoul-mobl> References: <20200203101806.2441-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: dmaengine-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org On 03-02-20, 12:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 12:32 PM Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > > dma_request_slave_channel_reason() no longer have user in mainline, it > > can be removed. > > > > Advise users of dma_request_slave_channel() and > > dma_request_slave_channel_compat() to move to dma_request_slave_chan() > > How? There are legacy ARM boards you have to care / remove before. > DMAengine subsystem makes a p*s off decisions without taking care of > (I'm talking now about dma release callback, for example) end users. Can you elaborate issue you are seeing with dma_release callback? -- ~Vinod