From: "André Przywara" <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Amit Singh Tomar <amittomer25@gmail.com>,
vkoul@kernel.org, afaerber@suse.de,
manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org
Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com, cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-actions@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/9] dmaengine: Actions: Add support for S700 DMA engine
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 18:02:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d6d6523-7a9f-97a1-124c-cca8f10f1c2f@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1589472657-3930-3-git-send-email-amittomer25@gmail.com>
On 14/05/2020 17:10, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
Hi,
> DMA controller present on S700 SoC is compatible with the one on S900
> (as most of registers are same), but it has different DMA descriptor
> structure where registers "fcnt" and "ctrlb" uses different encoding.
>
> For instance, on S900 "fcnt" starts at offset 0x0c and uses upper 12
> bits whereas on S700, it starts at offset 0x1c and uses lower 12 bits.
>
> This commit adds support for DMA controller present on S700.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Singh Tomar <amittomer25@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes since RFC:
> * Added accessor function to get the frame lenght.
> * Removed the SoC specific check in IRQ routine.
> ---
> drivers/dma/owl-dma.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/owl-dma.c b/drivers/dma/owl-dma.c
> index b0d80a2fa383..afa6c6f43d26 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/owl-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/owl-dma.c
> @@ -134,6 +134,11 @@ enum owl_dmadesc_offsets {
> OWL_DMADESC_SIZE
> };
>
> +enum owl_dma_id {
> + S900_DMA,
> + S700_DMA,
> +};
> +
> /**
> * struct owl_dma_lli - Link list for dma transfer
> * @hw: hardware link list
> @@ -200,6 +205,7 @@ struct owl_dma_vchan {
> * @pchans: array of data for the physical channels
> * @nr_vchans: the number of physical channels
> * @vchans: array of data for the physical channels
> + * @devid: device id based on OWL SoC
> */
> struct owl_dma {
> struct dma_device dma;
> @@ -214,6 +220,7 @@ struct owl_dma {
>
> unsigned int nr_vchans;
> struct owl_dma_vchan *vchans;
> + enum owl_dma_id devid;
> };
>
> static void pchan_update(struct owl_dma_pchan *pchan, u32 reg,
> @@ -308,6 +315,11 @@ static inline u32 llc_hw_ctrlb(u32 int_ctl)
> return ctl;
> }
>
> +static inline u32 llc_hw_flen(struct owl_dma_lli *lli)
Drop the inline, that's not needed. The compiler knows better.
> +{
> + return lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_FLEN] & GENMASK(19, 0);
> +}
Please introduce this function in the previous patch already. Otherwise
you replace code here that you introduced only there.
> +
> static void owl_dma_free_lli(struct owl_dma *od,
> struct owl_dma_lli *lli)
> {
> @@ -354,6 +366,7 @@ static inline int owl_dma_cfg_lli(struct owl_dma_vchan *vchan,
> struct dma_slave_config *sconfig,
> bool is_cyclic)
> {
> + struct owl_dma *od = to_owl_dma(vchan->vc.chan.device);
> u32 mode, ctrlb;
>
> mode = OWL_DMA_MODE_PW(0);
> @@ -409,8 +422,14 @@ static inline int owl_dma_cfg_lli(struct owl_dma_vchan *vchan,
> lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_DADDR] = dst;
> lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_SRC_STRIDE] = 0;
> lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_DST_STRIDE] = 0;
> - lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_FLEN] = len | 1 << 20;
> - lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_CTRLB] = ctrlb;
> +
> + if (od->devid == S700_DMA) {
> + lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_FLEN] = len;
> + lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_CTRLB] = 1 | ctrlb;
> + } else {
> + lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_FLEN] = len | 1 << 20;
> + lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_CTRLB] = ctrlb;
Can you either add comments or use macros to explain what's going on
here? What is the "1" about?
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -572,7 +591,7 @@ static irqreturn_t owl_dma_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>
> global_irq_pending = dma_readl(od, OWL_DMA_IRQ_PD0);
>
> - if (chan_irq_pending && !(global_irq_pending & BIT(i))) {
> + if (chan_irq_pending && !(global_irq_pending & BIT(i))) {
> dev_dbg(od->dma.dev,
> "global and channel IRQ pending match err\n");
>
> @@ -741,9 +760,9 @@ static u32 owl_dma_getbytes_chan(struct owl_dma_vchan *vchan)
> list_for_each_entry(lli, &txd->lli_list, node) {
> /* Start from the next active node */
> if (lli->phys == next_lli_phy) {
> - list_for_each_entry(lli, &txd->lli_list, node)
> - bytes += lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_FLEN] &
> - GENMASK(19, 0);
> + list_for_each_entry(lli, &txd->lli_list,
> + node)
Not needed line break?
Cheers,
Andre.
> + bytes += llc_hw_flen(lli);
> break;
> }
> }
> @@ -774,7 +793,7 @@ static enum dma_status owl_dma_tx_status(struct dma_chan *chan,
> if (vd) {
> txd = to_owl_txd(&vd->tx);
> list_for_each_entry(lli, &txd->lli_list, node)
> - bytes += lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_FLEN] & GENMASK(19, 0);
> + bytes += llc_hw_flen(lli);
> } else {
> bytes = owl_dma_getbytes_chan(vchan);
> }
> @@ -1031,11 +1050,20 @@ static struct dma_chan *owl_dma_of_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec,
> return chan;
> }
>
> +static const struct of_device_id owl_dma_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "actions,s900-dma", .data = (void *)S900_DMA,},
> + { .compatible = "actions,s700-dma", .data = (void *)S700_DMA,},
> + { /* sentinel */ },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, owl_dma_match);
> +
> static int owl_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> struct owl_dma *od;
> int ret, i, nr_channels, nr_requests;
> + const struct of_device_id *of_id =
> + of_match_device(owl_dma_match, &pdev->dev);
>
> od = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*od), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!od)
> @@ -1060,6 +1088,8 @@ static int owl_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "dma-channels %d, dma-requests %d\n",
> nr_channels, nr_requests);
>
> + od->devid = (enum owl_dma_id)of_id->data;
> +
> od->nr_pchans = nr_channels;
> od->nr_vchans = nr_requests;
>
> @@ -1192,12 +1222,6 @@ static int owl_dma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static const struct of_device_id owl_dma_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "actions,s900-dma", },
> - { /* sentinel */ }
> -};
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, owl_dma_match);
> -
> static struct platform_driver owl_dma_driver = {
> .probe = owl_dma_probe,
> .remove = owl_dma_remove,
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-14 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1589472657-3930-1-git-send-email-amittomer25@gmail.com>
2020-05-14 16:10 ` [PATCH v1 1/9] dmaengine: Actions: get rid of bit fields from dma descriptor Amit Singh Tomar
2020-05-14 18:27 ` Vinod Koul
2020-05-14 18:34 ` Amit Tomer
2020-05-15 6:58 ` Vinod Koul
2020-05-15 7:46 ` Amit Tomer
2020-05-15 11:11 ` Amit Tomer
2020-05-14 16:10 ` [PATCH v1 2/9] dmaengine: Actions: Add support for S700 DMA engine Amit Singh Tomar
2020-05-14 17:02 ` André Przywara [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6d6d6523-7a9f-97a1-124c-cca8f10f1c2f@arm.com \
--to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=amittomer25@gmail.com \
--cc=cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-actions@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).