From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F02C7618E for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 11:23:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7093021655 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 11:23:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="bVgt5oMZ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387647AbfG2LXZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 07:23:25 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f66.google.com ([209.85.221.66]:44567 "EHLO mail-wr1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387450AbfG2LXY (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 07:23:24 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f66.google.com with SMTP id p17so61392212wrf.11; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 04:23:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7FSTYRCDuN8ugCkUACc2sS4c/sxO9MPaWoEgh7iEEsE=; b=bVgt5oMZu9vka1vXyxfezj5eUPF8tafHtuB8RDF5PL5XefOI5mn84bdcGgEYFQWdBD v3/RzVElyj8HrIjajPHz9JfYqtYa1a1yA8hfjYuu81uuZW+L4M6UDlbC+97IeFIaW79S VyfhVHIyNKEDN8aDRs1lSXylanKCL5tamDdd0LGZFSuGIdZhIA5YtQMSnnlPGOXYI+uB otASFE6nLMIXfBJnLYqx5jtskcjMG1v7YFrGQrTtLxogh4D9ruZUok7QnLA9zT0nF3y9 Mad/lcbjmcAfGQ+6KgMGFjkt1CTbHPYd7gc6HCKZGD+kgkTJ+bsGFjbvG/audBf5AYAL O2cQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7FSTYRCDuN8ugCkUACc2sS4c/sxO9MPaWoEgh7iEEsE=; b=dMkc5k2gWxxoAQgaJU6mKcEv6bVxVspczfTKRuDOZ2NfcHG2MF4EsNUgmfIXE0XYw0 GLcr1SqxK+e8X0sDbobOIZ+z3aW+R7oiR7CAj30B04oMy6Qpw1SmOd3H/C/+Wcyj86ZW ytXaMyoxqgYiEQ4AXmzBJ/cmtkKmlWGoFKgFJcXM1exRFaFI5J5niFkFDnMYji2+KOkJ OX9PJ+D4oghLAOChwV+HiM/kc9MTHBLlnWnUXqWd08J06xloCZswIHcAaGRyTHFx5v6u U44tQlgXG4+UY0ZkVbPpyy195BSP1G7YMF7534LCOm5Y2nPJrDg5HOa51dQLlZ0p8j7s wC8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUETAvd7ZCTC+tqyM9seHLNOmA2xniwhgJq6rrqr7VZifwnd8IS aslE1QdHMzRZhvcJQjU23W2k18oL5yHLJpIEPGY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyKS6i0fcHmOYx363DJnPTuu/xw0bA5xIlQXAB08qPtFUJYujyOTv9lxMWA//8NpJVOebpAE1xkHqBFV70jCHw= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:514f:: with SMTP id u15mr21122702wrt.183.1564399401730; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 04:23:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190725220215.460-1-paul@crapouillou.net> In-Reply-To: <20190725220215.460-1-paul@crapouillou.net> From: Richard Weinberger Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:23:10 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] JZ4740 SoC cleanup To: Paul Cercueil Cc: Ralf Baechle , Paul Burton , James Hogan , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Vinod Koul , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , Lee Jones , Miquel Raynal , Richard Weinberger , Sebastian Reichel , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, DRI mailing list , LKML , od@zcrc.me, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: dmaengine-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 12:02 AM Paul Cercueil wrote: > > Hi, > > This patchset converts the Qi LB60 MIPS board to devicetree and makes it > use all the shiny new drivers that have been developed or updated > recently. > > All the crappy old drivers and custom code can be dropped since they > have been replaced by better alternatives. > > Some of these alternatives are not yet in 5.3-rc1 but have already been > accepted by their respective maintainer for inclusion in 5.4-rc1. > > To upstream this patchset, I think that as soon as MIPS maintainers > agree to take patches 01-03/11 and 11/11, the other patches can go > through their respective maintainer's tree. Was this series tested with the Ben Nanonote device? I have one of these and from time to time I upgrade the kernel on it. -- Thanks, //richard