dmaengine.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: Vinod <vkoul@kernel.org>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"open list:DMA GENERIC OFFLOAD ENGINE SUBSYSTEM" 
	<dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: dma: ti-edma: Add option for reserved channel ranges
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 14:10:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJ6R9X93vVM6A6H5yDFnQk5T7ym126TRb140m5COD3nwg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15d5dc03-d6ca-f438-f37a-e71298abda95@ti.com>

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:19 AM Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 30/08/2019 8.37, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > Rob,
> >
> > On 30/08/2019 1.47, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 03:56:17PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >>> Similarly to paRAM slots, channels can be used by other cores.
> >>>
> >>> Add optional property to configure the reserved channel ranges.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt | 5 +++++
> >>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt
> >>> index 4bbc94d829c8..1198682ada99 100644
> >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt
> >>> @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ Optional properties:
> >>>  - ti,edma-reserved-slot-ranges: PaRAM slot ranges which should not be used by
> >>>             the driver, they are allocated to be used by for example the
> >>>             DSP. See example.
> >>> +- ti,edma-reserved-chan-ranges: channel ranges which should not be used by
> >>> +           the driver, they are allocated to be used by for example the
> >>> +           DSP. See example.
> >>
> >> Based on the other thread, I think extending dma-channel-mask to a
> >> uint32-array makes sense here.
> >
> > Yes, that is the reason I have asked on that and I'm in progress of
> > converting the edma driver to use the dma-channel-mask.
> > Just need to do some shuffling in the driver to get the mask in a form
> > usable by the driver.
> >
> > I'll send an updated series early next week.
>
> How should the dma-channel-mask uint31-array should be documented and used?
>
> Basically some EDMA have 32, some 64 channels. This is fine.
> Let's say I want to mask out channel 0-4 and 24-27
>
> This would look like in case of EDMA with 32 channels:
> &edma {
>         /* channel 0-4 and 24-27 is not to be used */
>         dma-channel-mask = <0xf0fffff0>;
> };
>
> How this should look like in case when I have 64 channels?
> &edma {
>         /* channel 0-4 and 24-27 is not to be used */
>         dma-channel-mask = <0xf0fffff0>, <0xffffffff>;
> };
>
> When I read the u32s then
> chan_mask[0] is for channel 0-31 (LSB is channel 0)
> chan_maks[1] is for channel 32-63 (LSB is channel 32)
>
> Or:
> &edma {
>         /* channel 0-4 and 24-27 is not to be used */
>         dma-channel-mask = <0xffffffff>, <0xf0fffff0>;
> };
>
> chan_maks[0] is for channel 32-63 (LSB is channel 32)
> chan_mask[1] is for channel 0-31 (LSB is channel 0)
>
> Do you have pointer on already established notion on how to document and
> handle this?

As far as word ordering, I guess you can do whatever order you want.
MSB first would make the most sense if this was only going to be up to
64-bit. But given it could be 96, 128, ... bits, probably the least
significant word first makes sense and is easier to parse for a
variable length.

The binding schema can be something like this:

items:
  - description: Mask of channels 0-31
  - description: Mask of channels 32-63

The length is implied by the number of list items.

Rob

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-06 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-23 12:56 [PATCH 0/5] dmaengine: ti: edma: Multicore usage related fixes Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-23 12:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] dmaengine: ti: edma: Do not reset reserved paRAM slots Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-23 12:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] dmaengine: ti: edma: Only reset region0 access registers Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-23 12:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] dmaengine: ti: edma: Use bitmap_set() instead of open coded edma_set_bits() Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-23 12:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: dma: ti-edma: Add option for reserved channel ranges Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Rob Herring
2019-08-30  5:37     ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-09-03 10:19       ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-09-06 13:10         ` Rob Herring [this message]
2019-08-23 12:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] dmaengine: ti: edma: Add support for handling reserved channels Peter Ujfalusi
2019-09-04  9:49 ` [PATCH 0/5] dmaengine: ti: edma: Multicore usage related fixes Vinod Koul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAL_JsqJ6R9X93vVM6A6H5yDFnQk5T7ym126TRb140m5COD3nwg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).