DPDK-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Cc: "Zhang, Xiao" <xiao.zhang@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
	"Stokes, Ian" <ian.stokes@intel.com>,
	 "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"Ye, Xiaolong" <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [v3] net/i40e: fix vlan packets drop
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2019 03:01:09 +0000
Message-ID: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E7061153DC6C1E@SHSMSX105.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3103941.IzeQdVNKZZ@xps>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Sent: Saturday, November 9, 2019 3:49 AM
> To: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> Cc: Zhang, Xiao <xiao.zhang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei
> <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Stokes, Ian
> <ian.stokes@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org; Andrew Rybchenko
> <arybchenko@solarflare.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Ye,
> Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [v3] net/i40e: fix vlan packets drop
> 
> 08/11/2019 20:28, Kevin Traynor:
> > Hi Xiao,
> >
> > On 29/10/2019 05:12, Xiao Zhang wrote:
> > > VLAN packets with ip length bigger than 1496 will not be received by
> > > i40e/i40evf due to wrong packets size checking. This patch fixes the
> > > issue by correcting the maximum frame size during checking.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 43e5488c0ac6 ("net/i40e: support MTU configuration")
> > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Xiao Zhang <xiao.zhang@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > v3
> > > Checking more places using max packet len.
> > > v2
> > > Add fix for i40evf and correct the checking when using the max_pkt_len.
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c    |  2 +-
> > >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 11 +++++++----
> > >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c      |  2 +-
> > >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c      |  9 ++++++---
> > >  lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c    | 10 ++++++++--
> > >  lib/librte_net/rte_ether.h        |  1 +
> > >  6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > > @@ -1257,11 +1257,17 @@ rte_eth_dev_configure(uint16_t port_id,
> uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
> > >  			goto rollback;
> > >  		}
> > >  	} else {
> > > +		/**
> > > +		 * The overhead from MTU to max frame size.
> > > +		 * Considering VLAN and QinQ packet, the VLAN tag size
> > > +		 * needs to be added to RTE_ETHER_MAX_LEN.
> > > +		 */
> > >  		if (dev_conf->rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len < RTE_ETHER_MIN_LEN
> ||
> > > -			dev_conf->rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len > RTE_ETHER_MAX_LEN)
> > > +			dev_conf->rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len > RTE_ETHER_MAX_LEN
> > > +				+ RTE_ETHER_VLAN_LEN * 2)
> > >  			/* Use default value */
> > >  			dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len =
> > > -							RTE_ETHER_MAX_LEN;
> > > +				RTE_ETHER_MAX_LEN + RTE_ETHER_VLAN_LEN * 2;
> >
> > +cc ethdev maintainers
> >
> > This looks ok to me for i40e case, but I don't know if there is a
> > consequence for other PMDs. It seems late to change this, so maybe you
> > can live without this part for now.
> >
> > Even on the i40e parts, there can be some subtle bug and I requested
> > i40e maintainers to review carefully but it has not happened, so for
> > me it shouldn't be merged at present.
> 
> I would nack for another, simpler, reason:
> No ethdev behaviour change should be submitted if title does not start with
> "ethdev:" and if ethdev maintainers are not Cc'ed.
> 
> 
Yes, the patch should be dropped even without the ethdev part change, the fix for i40e need more refine. 
Sorry for review this late.



      reply index

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-14  7:53 [dpdk-dev] " Xiao Zhang
2019-10-14 17:41 ` Kevin Traynor
2019-10-15  1:41   ` Zhang, Xiao
2019-10-21  2:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [v2] " Xiao Zhang
2019-10-21 20:15   ` Kevin Traynor
2019-10-29  5:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [v3] " Xiao Zhang
2019-11-08 19:28   ` Kevin Traynor
2019-11-08 19:49     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-09  3:01       ` Zhang, Qi Z [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E7061153DC6C1E@SHSMSX105.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=ian.stokes@intel.com \
    --cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=xiao.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/dpdk-dev/0 dpdk-dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dpdk-dev dpdk-dev/ https://lore.kernel.org/dpdk-dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dpdk-dev

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git