From: "Sun, GuinanX" <guinanx.sun@intel.com>
To: "Guo, Jia" <jia.guo@intel.com>,
"Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix link status
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:26:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <05758BDAD7FC8E4BAED63D0390A8A95587FCD1@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <426f9eeb-21b0-cf17-9161-aab428a88399@intel.com>
Hi Jeff
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guo, Jia
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2020 5:12 PM
> To: Sun, GuinanX <guinanx.sun@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei
> <beilei.xing@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/i40e: fix link status
>
> hi, guinan
>
> On 7/30/2020 4:25 PM, Guinan Sun wrote:
> > The PF driver supports to use link_event_adv or link_event to get the
> > link speed. However, when using link_event_adv to get link speed,
> > there is a lack of logic to convert between link speed type
> > (I40E_LINK_SPEED_XXX) and mbps type (SPEED_XXX).
> > As a result, the mbps type is not recognized, so the link status down
> > problem occurs. This patch is used for type replacement between speed
> > types.
> >
> > Fixes: 2a73125b7041 ("i40evf: fix link info update")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guinan Sun <guinanx.sun@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/i40e/base/virtchnl.h | 8 +++++-
> > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> -
> > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_pf.c | 4 +++
> > 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/base/virtchnl.h
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/base/virtchnl.h
> > index 4f498ca45..90c404fb8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/base/virtchnl.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/base/virtchnl.h
> > @@ -240,7 +240,8 @@ VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN(16,
> virtchnl_vsi_resource);
> > #define VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_ENCAP 0X00100000
> > #define VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_ENCAP_CSUM 0X00200000
> > #define VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_RX_ENCAP_CSUM 0X00400000
> > -
> > +/* Define below the capability flags that are not offloads */
> > +#define VIRTCHNL_VF_CAP_ADV_LINK_SPEED 0x00000080
> > #define VF_BASE_MODE_OFFLOADS (VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_L2 | \
> > VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_VLAN | \
> > VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_RSS_PF) @@ -540,6
> +541,11 @@ struct
> > virtchnl_pf_event {
> > enum virtchnl_link_speed link_speed;
> > bool link_status;
> > } link_event;
> > + struct {
> > + /* link_speed provided in Mbps */
> > + u32 link_speed;
> > + u8 link_status;
> > + } link_event_adv;
> > } event_data;
> >
> > int severity;
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > index 69cab8e73..f8cf45fbe 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > @@ -1386,8 +1386,46 @@ i40evf_handle_pf_event(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> uint8_t *msg,
> > break;
> > case VIRTCHNL_EVENT_LINK_CHANGE:
> > PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "VIRTCHNL_EVENT_LINK_CHANGE
> event");
> > - vf->link_up = pf_msg->event_data.link_event.link_status;
> > - vf->link_speed = pf_msg->event_data.link_event.link_speed;
> > +
> > + if (vf->vf_res->vf_cap_flags &
> VIRTCHNL_VF_CAP_ADV_LINK_SPEED) {
> > + vf->link_up =
> > + pf_msg-
> >event_data.link_event_adv.link_status;
> > +
> > + switch (pf_msg-
> >event_data.link_event_adv.link_speed) {
> > + case ETH_SPEED_NUM_100M:
> > + vf->link_speed = I40E_LINK_SPEED_100MB;
> > + break;
> > + case ETH_SPEED_NUM_1G:
> > + vf->link_speed = I40E_LINK_SPEED_1GB;
> > + break;
> > + case ETH_SPEED_NUM_2_5G:
> > + vf->link_speed = I40E_LINK_SPEED_2_5GB;
> > + break;
> > + case ETH_SPEED_NUM_5G:
> > + vf->link_speed = I40E_LINK_SPEED_5GB;
> > + break;
> > + case ETH_SPEED_NUM_10G:
> > + vf->link_speed = I40E_LINK_SPEED_10GB;
> > + break;
> > + case ETH_SPEED_NUM_20G:
> > + vf->link_speed = I40E_LINK_SPEED_20GB;
> > + break;
> > + case ETH_SPEED_NUM_25G:
> > + vf->link_speed = I40E_LINK_SPEED_25GB;
> > + break;
> > + case ETH_SPEED_NUM_40G:
> > + vf->link_speed = I40E_LINK_SPEED_40GB;
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + vf->link_speed =
> I40E_LINK_SPEED_UNKNOWN;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + vf->link_up =
> > + pf_msg->event_data.link_event.link_status;
>
>
> Is the link_status the same of processing whatever adv speed cap?
They are not the same process, so it's no need to change.
>
>
> > + vf->link_speed =
> > + pf_msg->event_data.link_event.link_speed;
> > + }
> > break;
> > case VIRTCHNL_EVENT_PF_DRIVER_CLOSE:
> > PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG,
> "VIRTCHNL_EVENT_PF_DRIVER_CLOSE event"); diff
> > --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_pf.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_pf.c index
> > 7bf1e7941..33af30bbb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_pf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_pf.c
> > @@ -320,6 +320,10 @@ i40e_pf_host_process_cmd_get_vf_resource(struct
> i40e_pf_vf *vf, uint8_t *msg,
> > else
> > vf->request_caps = *(uint32_t *)msg;
> >
> > +#ifdef VIRTCHNL_VF_CAP_ADV_LINK_SPEED
> > + vf_res->vf_cap_flags |= VIRTCHNL_VF_CAP_ADV_LINK_SPEED; #endif
> /*
> > +VIRTCHNL_VF_CAP_ADV_LINK_SPEED */
> > +
>
>
> Below code is after your change here, be careful to use "|=" please.
Yes, you are right, Iwill take care of it.
But there is a problem with the logic of this code, which will be removed later.
>
> vf_res->vf_cap_flags = vf->request_caps &
> I40E_VIRTCHNL_OFFLOAD_CAPS;
>
>
> > /* enable all RSS by default,
> > * doesn't support hena setting by virtchnnl yet.
> > */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-30 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-30 8:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix link status Guinan Sun
2020-07-30 9:12 ` Jeff Guo
2020-07-30 9:26 ` Sun, GuinanX [this message]
2020-07-30 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Guinan Sun
2020-07-30 10:51 ` Wang, ShougangX
2020-07-30 10:57 ` Jeff Guo
2020-07-31 2:29 ` Xing, Beilei
2020-07-31 2:37 ` Wang, ShougangX
2020-07-31 3:50 ` Xing, Beilei
2020-07-31 4:09 ` Sun, GuinanX
2020-08-06 8:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Guinan Sun
2020-08-06 9:46 ` Wang, ShougangX
2020-08-06 10:08 ` Xing, Beilei
2020-08-07 2:09 ` Jeff Guo
2020-08-31 0:52 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2020-08-31 13:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-01 8:52 ` Sun, GuinanX
2020-09-02 8:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Guinan Sun
2020-09-03 8:38 ` Jeff Guo
2020-09-03 8:43 ` Min, JiaqiX
2020-09-04 6:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Guinan Sun
2020-09-07 5:04 ` Zhang, Qi Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=05758BDAD7FC8E4BAED63D0390A8A95587FCD1@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=guinanx.sun@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jia.guo@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).