From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01228C0650E for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 18:32:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92CD621882 for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 18:32:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 92CD621882 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev-bounces@dpdk.org Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E6F1E20; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 20:32:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AACB1D9E for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 20:31:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Jul 2019 11:31:59 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,446,1557212400"; d="scan'208";a="172231179" Received: from fmsmsx108.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.206]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Jul 2019 11:31:58 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx115.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.19) by FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 11:31:57 -0700 Received: from FMSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.15.43]) by fmsmsx115.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.71]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 11:31:56 -0700 From: "Chautru, Nicolas" To: Thomas Monjalon , "akhil.goyal@nxp.com" , "Yigit, Ferruh" , "Mokhtar, Amr" , "Chalupnik, KamilX" , "Richardson, Bruce" CC: "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/7] bbdev: adding support in BBDEV for 5GNR FEC Thread-Index: AQHVMcniX1gy47uYt0m5G0jtPZRdsaa5Mx2g Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 18:31:55 +0000 Message-ID: <1183128033837D43A851F70F33ED5C575C1CD663@FMSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1561344776-43990-2-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> <1562167450-314880-1-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> <1725731.Q9tSj3VpiJ@xps> In-Reply-To: <1725731.Q9tSj3VpiJ@xps> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiYzk1MWMwZDgtNmYyMi00NWJhLTgxOWItZTdhMDljNmNiNGJjIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiUnJmNFdPMFNLbklIbzJQaTE1VVY5b1lvdTlpV3NqbXlBQ1wvXC9FWUs4TTB5V1wvbWdSbnNBZmNvd29QXC9qMzkxZ1YifQ== x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.600.7 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.1.200.108] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/7] bbdev: adding support in BBDEV for 5GNR FEC X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Thomas wrote: >> Nicolas Chautru (7): >> bbdev: renaming non-generic LTE specific structure >> bbdev: extension of BBDEV API for 5G FEC >> docs/guides: updating bbdev API for 5GNR operations >> baseband/turbo_sw: extension of turbosw PMD for 5G >> docs/guides: updating building steps for BBDEV PMD >> test-bbdev: update of bbdev test-app for 5GNR >> test-bbdev: test vectors for 5GNR verification > >What are the news about the turbo_sw PMD? >We are still not able to compile it. >After a very long time of asking for the dependency, what can be the incen= tive to get Intel delivering it? >Should we block any merge in bbdev until it happens? Hi Thomas,=20 What you are referring to was resolved with that previous serie https://pat= ches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D5093&state=3D* The turbo_sw_pmd is built by default now and is verified by the DPDK CI. As= an option this can be built against the real time signal processing librar= ies (FlexRAN FEC SDK). The link to latest version of this library is also p= rovided https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/flexran-lte-and-5g-nr-fec= -software-development-kit-modules> I believe that you reviewed this scheme previously earlier Ferruh of the Te= ch board as you did provide feedback on the related published article as we= ll as recommended to split the previous serie into several patchsets.=20 The last serie under review here in that email thread is the extension of t= he turbo_sw_pmd driver to support 5GNR operations but still rely on the exa= ct same model and dependency, the only limitation is that these libraries r= equires AVX512 support for 5GNR operations.=20 Let me know whether there is any discrepancy and want to discuss further th= rough that mailing list, tech board or other method. In case you are trying= to compile the SDK and have any issues let us know as well.=20 Talk to you soon,=20 Thanks and regards,=20 Nic