From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AC4C7618F for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 14:51:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE6B217F4 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 14:51:20 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CEE6B217F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev-bounces@dpdk.org Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED3F1B53; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 16:51:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5946DDE3 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 16:51:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Jul 2019 07:51:17 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,278,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="319665050" Received: from fmsmsx106.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.204]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Jul 2019 07:51:16 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx156.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.74) by FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 07:51:16 -0700 Received: from FMSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.15.78]) by fmsmsx156.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.13.183]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 07:51:16 -0700 From: "Chautru, Nicolas" To: Thomas Monjalon CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Mcnamara, John" , "Kovacevic, Marko" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: fix PDF build of bbdev prog guide Thread-Index: AQHVPWyj7yh/yF9u10+PR156zKwLI6bQ3AMA//+XjLA= Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 14:51:15 +0000 Message-ID: <1183128033837D43A851F70F33ED5C575C1FD4F3@FMSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1563431079-14170-1-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> <2158485.gHaOC2YqBv@xps> In-Reply-To: <2158485.gHaOC2YqBv@xps> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiMzYwYjgzNGEtOTU5Zi00MzQyLTgxNzktZjhiYWJhY2FlMmE5IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiVEl6U2wwSFdmM3crZ0E5aXE2VERwWGVIZHpZY0xQT3dKcFZVUmpZNmpteTFkaVE3Y2NpRFk4UGJSaEFNMThYSCJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.600.7 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.1.200.108] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: fix PDF build of bbdev prog guide X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]=20 >18/07/2019 08:24, Nicolas Chautru: >> Some machine (like on dpdk.org) may fail to build the prog guide PDF bec= ause of the complex table inserted in the bbdev chapter. >>=20 >> Fixes: 3f3f608142cf ("doc: update bbdev guide for 5GNR operations") >>=20 >> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru > >Thanks for the quick reaction. >If you agree, I can apply this patch without the changes of figure refs. No problem, we can fix the other cosmetic changes that you have raised post= 19.09.=20 >About the tables, there are simpler syntax in RsT: >http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/user/rst/quickref.html#tables To be honest, I cannot see the problem with the current format which is fol= lowing that structure already.=20 What error message do you get on your machine? This is not caught on DPDK C= I, is it?=20 >You can also consider the definition lists: >http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/user/rst/quickref.html#definition-lis= ts Clearer has a formal table from my point of view.=20 Thanks