From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F1DC433ED for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 00:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E21861420 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 00:51:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1E21861420 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev-bounces@dpdk.org Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C94412DB; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 02:50:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com (szxga05-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.191]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96386412D3 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 02:50:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FVxgc3c9nzvTtm; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:48:12 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.69.192.56) by DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:50:39 +0800 From: "Min Hu (Connor)" To: CC: , , Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:50:46 +0800 Message-ID: <1619657448-57567-2-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1619657448-57567-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> References: <1616830818-3127-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> <1619657448-57567-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.69.192.56] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] examples/flow_classify: fix check of port and core X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" According to the comments and logging, the author just hope user to use the core and device which are in the same numa node for optimal performance. If not, A warning gives out. For example in flow_classify: ./build/flow_classify -a 0000:7d:00.1 -l 93 Here: 0000:7d:00.1 is on numa node 0. core 93 is on numa node 3. The two are not in same numa node, but no warning gives out in old codes. This patch can fix it. Fixes: bab16ddaf2c1 ("examples/flow_classify: add sample application") Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) --- examples/flow_classify/flow_classify.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/examples/flow_classify/flow_classify.c b/examples/flow_classify/flow_classify.c index 335d7d2..277a2f5 100644 --- a/examples/flow_classify/flow_classify.c +++ b/examples/flow_classify/flow_classify.c @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ lcore_main(struct flow_classifier *cls_app) * for best performance. */ RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(port) - if (rte_eth_dev_socket_id(port) > 0 && + if (rte_eth_dev_socket_id(port) >= 0 && rte_eth_dev_socket_id(port) != (int)rte_socket_id()) { printf("\n\n"); printf("WARNING: port %u is on remote NUMA node\n", -- 2.7.4