From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrien Mazarguil Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] net/mlx5: add VF information in configuration Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:10:10 +0100 Message-ID: <20180314171010.GL3994@6wind.com> References: <753252b906fbabad7095a1b2e18e035a59f51594.1520944256.git.nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Yongseok Koh , dev@dpdk.org To: Nelio Laranjeiro Return-path: Received: from mail-wr0-f179.google.com (mail-wr0-f179.google.com [209.85.128.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE59726F for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:10:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr0-f179.google.com with SMTP id h2so5476092wre.12 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:10:25 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <753252b906fbabad7095a1b2e18e035a59f51594.1520944256.git.nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 01:50:35PM +0100, Nelio Laranjeiro wrote: > Signed-off-by: Nelio Laranjeiro Perhaps with a line that states the reason given similar code was dropped by prior patch "net/mlx5: fix sriov flag", for instance: Subsequent patches will need a convenient method to determine if the underlying device is a VF. Make this information part of the configuration structure. Besides that: Acked-by: Adrien Mazarguil -- Adrien Mazarguil 6WIND