From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BADC432C3 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 05:06:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4857C20409 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 05:06:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4857C20409 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ntt-tx.co.jp Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev-bounces@dpdk.org Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F862C08; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 06:06:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from dish-sg.nttdocomo.co.jp (dish-sg.nttdocomo.co.jp [202.19.227.74]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5B22BF7 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 06:06:37 +0100 (CET) X-dD-Source: Outbound Received: from zssg-mailmd105.ddreams.local (zssg-mailmd900.ddreams.local [10.160.172.63]) by zssg-mailou102.ddreams.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AE7120104; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:06:35 +0900 (JST) Received: from t131sg-mailcc11.ddreams.local (t131sg-mailcc11.ddreams.local [100.66.31.86]) by zssg-mailmd105.ddreams.local (dDREAMS) with ESMTP id <0Q0Y00W1D0UZDZ90@dDREAMS>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:06:35 +0900 (JST) Received: from t131sg-mailcc12 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by t131sg-mailcc11.ddreams.local (unknown) with SMTP id xAE56ZB9031900; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:06:35 +0900 Received: from zssg-mailmf105.ddreams.local (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by zssg-mailmf105.ddreams.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677857E603A; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:06:23 +0900 (JST) Received: from zssg-mailmf105.ddreams.local (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D638E6068; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:06:23 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with SMTP id 630D08E605D; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:06:23 +0900 (JST) X-IMSS-HAND-OFF-DIRECTIVE: localhost:10026 Received: from zssg-mailmf105.ddreams.local (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7238E6058; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:06:23 +0900 (JST) Received: from zssg-mailua101.ddreams.local (unknown [10.160.172.62]) by zssg-mailmf105.ddreams.local (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:06:23 +0900 (JST) Received: from [10.87.198.18] (unknown [10.160.183.129]) by zssg-mailua101.ddreams.local (dDREAMS) with ESMTPA id <0Q0Y00W4F0UJYHZ0@dDREAMS>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:06:20 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:06:20 +0900 From: Hideyuki Yamashita In-reply-to: <20191114140134.88E8.17218CA3@ntt-tx.co.jp_1> References: <20191107200211.4C38.17218CA3@ntt-tx.co.jp_1> <20191114140134.88E8.17218CA3@ntt-tx.co.jp_1> Message-id: <20191114140620.88EB.17218CA3@ntt-tx.co.jp_1> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.74.02 [ja] X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 To: "dev@dpdk.org" Cc: Slava Ovsiienko Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] net/mlx5: support for flow action on VLAN header X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hello Slava, Note that I am using the following dpdk rc. DPDK 19.11 rc-1 BR, HIdeyuki Yamashita NTT TechnoCross > Hello Slava, > > As I reported to you, creating flow was successful with Connect-X5. > However when I sent packets to the NIC from outer side of > the host, I have problem. > > > [Case 1] > Packet distribution on multi-queue based on dst MAC address. > > NIC config: > 04:00.0 Mellanox Connect-X5 > 0.5.00.0 Intel XXV710 > > testpmd startup param: > sudo ./testpmd -c 1ffff -n 4 --socket-mem=1024,1024 --log-level=10 -w 04:00.0,dv_flow_en=1 -w 05:00.0 -- -i --rxq=16 --txq=16 --disable-rss --pkt-filter-mode=perfect > > flow command: > testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 11:22:33:44:55:66 / end actions queue index 1 / end > Flow rule #0 created > testpmd> flow create 1 ingress pattern eth dst is 11:22:33:44:55:66 type mask 0xffff / end actions queue index 1 / end > Flow rule #0 created > > Packet reception:(no VLAN tag) > port 0/queue 0: received 1 packets > src=CC:CC:CC:CC:CC:CC - dst=11:22:33:44:55:66 - type=0x0800 - length=60 - nb_segs=1 - hw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN L4_NONFRAG - sw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4 - l2_len=14 - l3_len=20 - Receive queue=0x0 > ol_flags: PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD PKT_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN > port 1/queue 0: sent 1 packets > src=CC:CC:CC:CC:CC:CC - dst=11:22:33:44:55:66 - type=0x0800 - length=60 - nb_segs=1 - hw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN L4_NONFRAG - sw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4 - l2_len=14 - l3_len=20 - Send queue=0x0 > ol_flags: PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD PKT_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN > > port 1/queue 1: received 1 packets > src=CC:CC:CC:CC:CC:CC - dst=11:22:33:44:55:66 - type=0x0800 - length=60 - nb_segs=1 - hw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN L4_ICMP - sw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4 - l2_len=14 - l3_len=20 - Receive queue=0x1 > ol_flags: PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD PKT_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN > port 0/queue 1: sent 1 packets > src=CC:CC:CC:CC:CC:CC - dst=11:22:33:44:55:66 - type=0x0800 - length=60 - nb_segs=1 - hw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN L4_ICMP - sw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4 - l2_len=14 - l3_len=20 - Send queue=0x1 > ol_flags: PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD PKT_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN > > Result: > Matched packet queued to queue=0 port=0. Not queue=1, port=0. > > Expectation: > When receiving packet which has dst MAC 11:22:33:44:55:66 should be > received on queue=1 port=0. > > Question: > Why matching packet is NOT enqueued into queue=1 on port=0? > > > [Case 2] > Packet distribution on multi-queue based on VLAN tag > > testpmd startup param: > sudo ./testpmd -c 1ffff -n 4 --socket-mem=1024,1024 --log-level=10 -w 04:00.0,dv_flow_en=1 -w 05:00.0 -- -i --rxq=16 --txq=16 --disable-rss --pkt-filter-mode=perfect > > flow command: > flow create 0 ingress group 1 pattern eth / vlan vid is 100 / end actions queue index 1 / of_pop_vlan / end > flow create 0 ingress group 0 pattern eth / end actions jump group 1 / end > > Packet Reception: (VLAN100) > port 0/queue 1: received 1 packets > src=CC:CC:CC:CC:CC:CC - dst=11:22:33:44:55:66 - type=0x0800 - length=56 - nb_segs=1 - hw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN L4_NONFRAG - sw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4 - l2_len=14 - l3_len=20 - Receive queue=0x1 > ol_flags: PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD PKT_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN > port 1/queue 1: sent 1 packets > src=CC:CC:CC:CC:CC:CC - dst=11:22:33:44:55:66 - type=0x0800 - length=56 - nb_segs=1 - hw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN L4_NONFRAG - sw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4 - l2_len=14 - l3_len=20 - Send queue=0x1 > ol_flags: PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD PKT_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN > > Result: > Matched packetd queued to queue=1, port=0 > Other packet(VLAN101 packet) discarded. > > Expectation: > Matched packet queued to queue =1, port=0 > Non Matched packet queued to queue=0, port=0 > > Question: > Is above behavior collect? > What is the default behavior of unmatchedd packets (queue to queue=0 or > discard packet) > > BR, > Hideyuki Yamashita > NTT TechnoCross > > > > 　 >