From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] eal: add uevent monitor for hot plug Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 14:44:32 +0100 Message-ID: <2285928.Pr9jqWPkcR@xps> References: <1509567405-27439-3-git-send-email-jia.guo@intel.com> <3539603.0DoXzmkF5E@xps> <01BA8470C017D6468C8290E4B9C5E1E83B2D1493@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: Mordechay Haimovsky , dev@dpdk.org, "stephen@networkplumber.org" , "Richardson, Bruce" , "Yigit, Ferruh" , "gaetan.rivet@6wind.com" , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , "shreyansh.jain@nxp.com" , "Wu, Jingjing" , "Zhang, Helin" , "Van Haaren, Harry" To: "Guo, Jia" Return-path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0D81B1AB for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 14:44:56 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <01BA8470C017D6468C8290E4B9C5E1E83B2D1493@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 09/01/2018 13:08, Guo, Jia: > Your comments about split it totally make sense ,no doubt that, but my question is that if split api with the funcational , so the function part should be set null implement or stake. Any other good idea or tip for that. Yes when introducing the callback API first, there will be no implementation, so the callbacks are not called. If needed you can have some empty functions.